User talk:SaboteurGG: Difference between revisions

m
mNo edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:
== Rankings order on pages ==
== Rankings order on pages ==


I've noticed that you seem to put the "Global Rankings" first on smasher pages by default. However, I feel like listing the ranking that the player is ranked highest on first (almost always a regional ranking) and then going down from there flows better with the page.
This is a somewhat minor gripe, but I've noticed that you seem to put the "Global Rankings" first on smasher pages by default. However, I feel like listing the ranking that the player is ranked highest on first (almost always a regional ranking) and then going down from there flows better with the page.


On the reverse end of the spectrum, though, I feel like for that same reason, it's unnecessary to list every ranking in the infobox for a smasher. I think just listing the most "influential" ranking list (for example, the "Global Rankings") will suffice.
On the reverse end of the spectrum, though, I feel like for that same reason, it's unnecessary to list every ranking in the infobox for a smasher. I think just listing the most "influential" ranking list (for example, the "Global Rankings") will suffice.


Also, just to follow up on the section right above this one, could you please stop putting just "Edited" in your edit summaries? It essentially tells us nothing about what you're changing. If you're going to do that, you're better off just leaving the edit summary blank. [[User:PokemonMasterJamal3|PokemonMasterJamal3]] ([[User talk:PokemonMasterJamal3|talk]]) 10:36, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
Also, just to follow up on the section right above this one, could you please stop putting just "Edited" in your edit summaries? It essentially tells us nothing about what you're changing. If you're going to do that, you're better off just leaving the edit summary blank. [[User:PokemonMasterJamal3|PokemonMasterJamal3]] ([[User talk:PokemonMasterJamal3|talk]]) 10:36, 30 June 2017 (EDT)