Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision: pages) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
La la la -> [[SmashWiki:Copyrights]] -- [[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 14:52, February 28, 2007 (GMT) | La la la -> [[SmashWiki:Copyrights]] -- [[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 14:52, February 28, 2007 (GMT) | ||
== Question == | |||
So, I decided to finally start editing the wiki again and restart my little project of revamping all Masterpiece pages. I was just going to edit the ones I didn't before, but I tought about something: when I edited these pages, I didn't only list the things that debuted in these games, but also their role in the games. However, in retrospect, I'm not sure if this was entirely necessary, as these types of things are explained in the individual pages for the characters/objects/etc. already. Should I remove these details and make these pages more of a list of references to the games, or are these details important enough to be in the pages? [[File:TepigSprite.png]][[User:Tepig|Tepig]] ([[User talk:Tepig|talk]]) 15:26, 17 November 2015 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 15:26, November 17, 2015
La la la -> SmashWiki:Copyrights -- Randall00 14:52, February 28, 2007 (GMT)
Question
So, I decided to finally start editing the wiki again and restart my little project of revamping all Masterpiece pages. I was just going to edit the ones I didn't before, but I tought about something: when I edited these pages, I didn't only list the things that debuted in these games, but also their role in the games. However, in retrospect, I'm not sure if this was entirely necessary, as these types of things are explained in the individual pages for the characters/objects/etc. already. Should I remove these details and make these pages more of a list of references to the games, or are these details important enough to be in the pages? 
Tepig (talk) 15:26, 17 November 2015 (EST)
