21,001
edits
EndGenuity (talk | contribs) (I agree that the recent vandalism is getting obnoxious, but increasing the number of active admins is not going to help, because the vandals can also increase in number.) |
Aidanzapunk (talk | contribs) (→Oppose) |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
#'''Moderate oppose'''. To be honest, I'm pretty questionable in your wiki handling skills, as I looked up everyone's opinion and there are slews of flaws you have. Your reasons to become an admin seems to be a lackluster, which it doesn't look good. That gives me a bad picture about how you would do with admin power. Should I trust you to become an admin? No thanks. I suggest you do RFA later in few months or more once you have to correct your core problems including some half of your disputes. [[User:Luigi540|Luigi540]] ([[User talk:Luigi540|talk]]) 01:51, 22 October 2015 (EDT) | #'''Moderate oppose'''. To be honest, I'm pretty questionable in your wiki handling skills, as I looked up everyone's opinion and there are slews of flaws you have. Your reasons to become an admin seems to be a lackluster, which it doesn't look good. That gives me a bad picture about how you would do with admin power. Should I trust you to become an admin? No thanks. I suggest you do RFA later in few months or more once you have to correct your core problems including some half of your disputes. [[User:Luigi540|Luigi540]] ([[User talk:Luigi540|talk]]) 01:51, 22 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
#Sure the recent fuck-load of vandalism is a growing and very nettling problem but that doesn't justify why ''you'' specifically should get adminship over everyone else. You're active a lot? Not a very good argument in my book. OT at the time of his RfA was very active but now he hasn't contributed in a month, and now he doesn't see anytime that he can be as active as he once was. Dispute handling? I'm looking at the argument on [[Talk:Tier list/Archive 7]] and it seems you let your emotions get the best of you. It's an admirable effort, but I don't think it qualifies as good dispute handling. As Toomai said, this seems like a rushed opportunity for you to obtain adminship in light of the recent vandalism. More than sufficient proof is the fact that you didn't even sign your RfA.<br>Overall, it seems you offer next to nothing over other candidates, and for that I '''strongly oppose''' you getting adminship. - [[User:EndGenuity|EndGenuity]] ([[User talk:EndGenuity|talk]]) 10:08, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | #Sure the recent fuck-load of vandalism is a growing and very nettling problem but that doesn't justify why ''you'' specifically should get adminship over everyone else. You're active a lot? Not a very good argument in my book. OT at the time of his RfA was very active but now he hasn't contributed in a month, and now he doesn't see anytime that he can be as active as he once was. Dispute handling? I'm looking at the argument on [[Talk:Tier list/Archive 7]] and it seems you let your emotions get the best of you. It's an admirable effort, but I don't think it qualifies as good dispute handling. As Toomai said, this seems like a rushed opportunity for you to obtain adminship in light of the recent vandalism. More than sufficient proof is the fact that you didn't even sign your RfA.<br>Overall, it seems you offer next to nothing over other candidates, and for that I '''strongly oppose''' you getting adminship. - [[User:EndGenuity|EndGenuity]] ([[User talk:EndGenuity|talk]]) 10:08, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
#:While almost all of that is true, the one thing I'd like to argue is that it isn't required that you sign your RfA.<br>That said, being active more means I can deal with vandals faster. In addition, for the last time, ''yes'', this was kind of rushed. I will gladly admit that. But I feel that I can use the admin tools in other ways. Maybe that's just me, idk. [[File:Aidanzapunksignature.png|20px]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: black;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: orange">'''Master of Speed and Aura'''</span>]][[File:AidanzapunkSignaturesmall.PNG]] 10:13, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | |||
==== Neutral ==== | ==== Neutral ==== | ||
#'''Neutral''' Normally this wiki wants admins who can handle user disputes, and I don't think user handling records are necessary to become a sysop. That should be a job for Bureaucrats. [[:User:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|ZeldaStarfoxfan2164]] ([[User talk:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|talk]]) is made in America 13:26, 20 October 2015 (EDT) | #'''Neutral''' Normally this wiki wants admins who can handle user disputes, and I don't think user handling records are necessary to become a sysop. That should be a job for Bureaucrats. [[:User:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|ZeldaStarfoxfan2164]] ([[User talk:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|talk]]) is made in America 13:26, 20 October 2015 (EDT) |