SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Aidanzapunk: Difference between revisions

(I agree that the recent vandalism is getting obnoxious, but increasing the number of active admins is not going to help, because the vandals can also increase in number.)
Line 37: Line 37:
#'''Moderate oppose'''. To be honest, I'm pretty questionable in your wiki handling skills, as I looked up everyone's opinion and there are slews of flaws you have. Your reasons to become an admin seems to be a lackluster, which it doesn't look good. That gives me a bad picture about how you would do with admin power. Should I trust you to become an admin? No thanks. I suggest you do RFA later in few months or more once you have to correct your core problems including some half of your disputes. [[User:Luigi540|Luigi540]] ([[User talk:Luigi540|talk]]) 01:51, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
#'''Moderate oppose'''. To be honest, I'm pretty questionable in your wiki handling skills, as I looked up everyone's opinion and there are slews of flaws you have. Your reasons to become an admin seems to be a lackluster, which it doesn't look good. That gives me a bad picture about how you would do with admin power. Should I trust you to become an admin? No thanks. I suggest you do RFA later in few months or more once you have to correct your core problems including some half of your disputes. [[User:Luigi540|Luigi540]] ([[User talk:Luigi540|talk]]) 01:51, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
#Sure the recent fuck-load of vandalism is a growing and very nettling problem but that doesn't justify why ''you'' specifically should get adminship over everyone else. You're active a lot? Not a very good argument in my book. OT at the time of his RfA was very active but now he hasn't contributed in a month, and now he doesn't see anytime that he can be as active as he once was. Dispute handling? I'm looking at the argument on [[Talk:Tier list/Archive 7]] and it seems you let your emotions get the best of you. It's an admirable effort, but I don't think it qualifies as good dispute handling. As Toomai said, this seems like a rushed opportunity for you to obtain adminship in light of the recent vandalism. More than sufficient proof is the fact that you didn't even sign your RfA.<br>Overall, it seems you offer next to nothing over other candidates, and for that I '''strongly oppose''' you getting adminship. - [[User:EndGenuity|EndGenuity]] ([[User talk:EndGenuity|talk]]) 10:08, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
#Sure the recent fuck-load of vandalism is a growing and very nettling problem but that doesn't justify why ''you'' specifically should get adminship over everyone else. You're active a lot? Not a very good argument in my book. OT at the time of his RfA was very active but now he hasn't contributed in a month, and now he doesn't see anytime that he can be as active as he once was. Dispute handling? I'm looking at the argument on [[Talk:Tier list/Archive 7]] and it seems you let your emotions get the best of you. It's an admirable effort, but I don't think it qualifies as good dispute handling. As Toomai said, this seems like a rushed opportunity for you to obtain adminship in light of the recent vandalism. More than sufficient proof is the fact that you didn't even sign your RfA.<br>Overall, it seems you offer next to nothing over other candidates, and for that I '''strongly oppose''' you getting adminship. - [[User:EndGenuity|EndGenuity]] ([[User talk:EndGenuity|talk]]) 10:08, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
#:While almost all of that is true, the one thing I'd like to argue is that it isn't required that you sign your RfA.<br>That said, being active more means I can deal with vandals faster. In addition, for the last time, ''yes'', this was kind of rushed. I will gladly admit that. But I feel that I can use the admin tools in other ways. Maybe that's just me, idk. [[File:Aidanzapunksignature.png|20px]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: black;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: orange">'''Master of Speed and Aura'''</span>]][[File:AidanzapunkSignaturesmall.PNG]] 10:13, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
==== Neutral ====
==== Neutral ====
#'''Neutral''' Normally this wiki wants admins who can handle user disputes, and I don't think user handling records are necessary to become a sysop. That should be a job for Bureaucrats. [[:User:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|ZeldaStarfoxfan2164]] ([[User talk:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|talk]]) is made in America  13:26, 20 October 2015 (EDT)
#'''Neutral''' Normally this wiki wants admins who can handle user disputes, and I don't think user handling records are necessary to become a sysop. That should be a job for Bureaucrats. [[:User:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|ZeldaStarfoxfan2164]] ([[User talk:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|talk]]) is made in America  13:26, 20 October 2015 (EDT)