27,478
edits
User talk:Miles of SmashWiki/Archive14: Difference between revisions
User talk:Miles of SmashWiki/Archive14 (view source)
Revision as of 12:07, March 20, 2015
, 9 years agono edit summary
TheNuttyOne (talk | contribs) (→Waking ban?: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| (67 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive}} | |||
{ | |||
== so uh == | == so uh == | ||
| Line 288: | Line 269: | ||
I don't think he deserved banned. His "removal of information" actually appears to be rephrasing to seem more professional- on Shulk's page, the information is rather excessive, while on everyone else's page it uses strange phrasing such as having the Wii Fit Trainer "knee" someone, which he changed to be "a jab with the knee". It seems perfectly good-faith. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|you]]. Or maybe [[User:Nutta Butta|Nutta.]] </small> 20:27, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | I don't think he deserved banned. His "removal of information" actually appears to be rephrasing to seem more professional- on Shulk's page, the information is rather excessive, while on everyone else's page it uses strange phrasing such as having the Wii Fit Trainer "knee" someone, which he changed to be "a jab with the knee". It seems perfectly good-faith. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|you]]. Or maybe [[User:Nutta Butta|Nutta.]] </small> 20:27, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | ||
:Except the user in question was ignoring repeated warnings to stop removing information in the process of rewriting. If you check the involved edits, a great deal of crucial information (such as damage %) was removed, and many of the rewrites did nothing but rephrase existing content. I still agree it was good faith, but counter-productive good faith after repeated ignored warnings deserves something a little more attention-grabbing. I explained as much on their talk page. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 20:33, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::The edit was clearly in good faith. Maybe he thought that there was an overwhelming amount of information on the page and wanted to make it easier to read. Explain it on his talk page why you're not supposed to remove stuff on pages before you unnecessarily block him. You can block him if he doesn't listen to you and keeps removing stuff without saying anything about it. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 20:47, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::Toom already did that several days ago, and I reminded them the same day after they continued in the same pattern. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 20:59, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::::Good job. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 21:03, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
== "Speculation" == | |||
When you report on widespread beliefs about a particular subject, '''it is considered a notable fact about the Smash community.''' [[Talk:Ridley#"Speculation"|How many times]] do you [[Talk:Tier list/Archive 7#Smash 4 tier list|have to be told this?]] In all the times that you've been confronted about this, I have never once seen you attempt to refute this statement. You clearly have no idea what you're doing if you think that an opinion held by a large amount of the Smash community is "speculation," and you should stay out of any articles here that have to do with the community. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 21:14, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:I'll also point out that the members of this Wiki who have been going against what I wrote on the policy have been refusing to respond to any opposing viewpoints on it. The ideas of what I wrote were already in the policy anyway; I just reworded it to make it easier to understand. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 21:18, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::"We report what the community says" is like fifteen steps lower on the priority list than "no speculation". This has been the policy here for ages for good reason. Stop insisting that it be changed, and for that matter stop assuming that I'm clueless. Trust me: I'm not. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 21:20, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::Once again, you completely ignored what I said and didn't respond to what I wrote about how when you report on widespread beliefs about a particular subject, it is considered a notable fact about the Smash community. If you don't like it being in the "no speculation" policy, then we can create a new policy called "SmashWiki reports on what the community thinks." | |||
:::This is one of the reasons why many people here have a negative view of you; you actively refuse to discuss and support your viewpoints while still asserting that you're right and then doing it all your way. If you want me to think that you're not clueless, prove it to me by showing that you can handle yourself properly when debating your viewpoint on a subject. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 21:27, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::::The logic behind "community opinion" works well for certain things and not for others. Tier lists established by a known committee of specific professional players are a known entity in the community, so we report on them. Scandals that affect hundreds of tourney players and spectators beyond that warrant being covered. However, when you start attempting to dig deeper, you quickly run into ambiguities and much heavier levels of opinionated content. For example, in the last few months, it would have been grossly inappropriate to speculate as to why VGBC and GIMR were avoiding the subject of Project M, even if there was a certain group in the community that had their theories. Since he explained his and thus VGBC's stance on the subject publicly, it is appropriate to link to it and cite that as the reason. | |||
::::As to your other point: you have an extraordinary tendency to assume your opinion is representative of the whole community, it seems. Not just on the subject of the Smash community supposedly believing things, but also in terms of what the wiki's userbase supposedly thinks. Consider for a moment that others (shockingly!) might not share your perspective. As with the tier list article, you are brazenly attempting to claim your personal thoughts of "what the community says" as factual and authoritative. They are not and will not be treated as such on SmashWiki. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 21:34, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::The people who believe in these opinions are also '''professional players,''' or at least knowledgeable players who are active members of the community. Take the VGBootCamp incident for example. Ask pretty much any community member and they will tell you that GimR dropped Project M either because Nintendo forced them to or GimR didn't want to hurt his business; he didn't need to make an official statement for anyone to figure that out. That's an example of a widespread belief. Ask any Brawl player and they will tell you that random tripping was added to Brawl because Sakurai is a casual scrub who wants to ruin competitive gameplay or something like that. Nintendo has never made an official statement on that, yet everyone in the community still has this opinion on the issue, and leaving it out would be excluding important information about the topic. Sure there's no real objective way to measure this kind of stuff, but we don't need numbers to measure that this is significant. | |||
:::::''"However, when you start attempting to dig deeper, you quickly run into ambiguities and much heavier levels of opinionated content. "'' | |||
:::::What "heavier levels of opinionated content?" If people's opinions are really scattered all over the place, then it probably isn't worth mentioning in the article because there's no widespread belief. In many cases, though, there is a '''widespread belief''' amongst the whole community about a certain topic. | |||
:::::''"For example, in the last few months, it would have been grossly inappropriate to speculate as to why VGBC and GIMR were avoiding the subject of Project M, even if there was a certain group in the community that had their theories. Since he explained his and thus VGBC's stance on the subject publicly, it is appropriate to link to it and cite that as the reason."'' | |||
:::::Even if the statement is released by someone who has complete authority over a subject, that doesn't stop the opinions from existing. Community members were also asking GimR whether Nintendo forced him to shut down PM or if it was his own decision, until he released a statement concerning this later. People can lie in their reasonings and cover up important details, and if everyone's suspecting something deep inside, then that's an important fact about the Smash community. What if there's no official statement for an action being done, such as when Nintendo shut down EVO 2013? It's not appropriate to just leave the section blank without stating what people think happened. Would it be appropriate to cover a historical event full of unanswered questions such as 9/11 or Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 without listing why people think it happened? | |||
:::::''"As to your other point: you have an extraordinary tendency to assume your opinion is representative of the whole community, it seems. Not just on the subject of the Smash community supposedly believing things, but also in terms of what the wiki's userbase supposedly thinks. Consider for a moment that others (shockingly!) might not share your perspective. As with the tier list article, you are brazenly attempting to claim your personal thoughts of "what the community says" as factual and authoritative. They are not and will not be treated as such on SmashWiki."'' | |||
:::::Why don't you apply this logic to yourself then? What if you're one of the only people who thinks that it's a stupid idea to report on what the community thinks, and what if you're one of the only people who thinks it's okay to abuse their admin powers and go around doing whatever you want without properly discussing the topic at hand? You say that we should consider what the wiki userbase supposedly thinks, but doesn't the wiki userbase supposedly say that '''we report on what the community thinks?''' I can tell you that I'm not one of the very few people who has my opinions. I believe that Smash is enjoyable when played competitively, that Melee is the best Smash game, and that Sakurai should gear the game more towards competitive players, while the casual players can still have fun with a "competitive" game by turning on items, etc. This opinion of Smash is shared by thousands of other players involved in the competitive community, including many of your so-called "professionals." Not only do I share beliefs with a group of people who are "a known entity in the community," but these people also believe that Diddy Kong is one of the best characters in Smash 4, and that Sakurai removed hitstun in Brawl to make the game less fun for competitive players. If you consider the beliefs of the professional players to be important, then these opinions should be included in the wiki as well. If you don't believe that the community has a widespread opinion on certain controversial topics, read what people say on the Internet. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 22:53, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::If you'd rather not argue with me, why don't you look at the Ridley talk page and see everything OT said about reporting what the community thinks? If you're not going to listen to me, I'm sure you'll listen to a mighty powerful admin over a lowly unimportant regular user. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 23:01, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::::::Where on earth does it say in SmashWiki's policies that we prioritize "community opinion" over facts? I don't believe such a rule exists anywhere but in your own delusions. As has been stated to you before: guesses, theories, and speculation aren't appropriate content. Facts are. If you are equating something to the effect of "we report tier lists" or "we report widespread tournament rules" with "we report community opinion as fact", then you are quite thoroughly mistaken. | |||
::::::Also, if you're going to sarcastically spout debate advice at me, here's some back at you: walls of text make you look like a blowhard, not somebody with a well thought-out argument; making wild comparisons to 9/11 in an unrelated context is Godwin's Law 2.0 and makes you sound foolish; and a flat appeal to "people say so!" is massively unconvincing even when relevant. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 23:07, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::::''"Where on earth does it say in SmashWiki's policies that we prioritize "community opinion" over facts?"'' | |||
:::::::It appears to me that you're the only user who's removing anything that has to deal with community opinion. | |||
:::::::''"If you are equating something to the effect of "we report tier lists" or "we report widespread tournament rules" with "we report community opinion as fact", then you are quite thoroughly mistaken."'' | |||
:::::::It is certainly not a fact that what the community says is definitely true. It's not a fact that Sakurai removed hitstun because he wanted to make the game more casual. I don't think anyone on the wiki would disagree with that. It is a fact, however, that '''there are many people''' who '''think''' that Sakurai removed hitstun because he wanted to make the game more casual. It's not a fact that what the community says is true. It is a fact that the community holds a widespread belief on some topic, and that belief may or may not be true. In the section about EVO 2013, I did not say, "Nintendo shut down EVO because it was opposed to the Smash Bros. games being played competitively," I said, "A commonly stated reason is that Nintendo was opposed to the Smash Bros. games being played competitively." | |||
:::::::''"walls of text make you look like a blowhard"'' | |||
:::::::Why should you expect the result of this to go in your favor if you're not going to respond to what I say? Did you know that those who work hard are the most successful in life? People who call others "blowhards" or "try-hards" are usually people who are jealous that they're not as successful in life. | |||
:::::::''"and a flat appeal to "people say so!" is massively unconvincing even when relevant"'' | |||
:::::::Except the topic at hand deals nearly entirely with what people say. "Community opinions that the wiki reports on" would not exist if there were no people who believed that way. Read the other stuff people have told you if you want more convincing reasons. | |||
:::::::''"making wild comparisons to 9/11 in an unrelated context is Godwin's Law 2.0 and makes you sound foolish;"'' | |||
:::::::I use 9/11 as an example because it is an extremely notable and well-known event in history that has a lot of unsolved questions and mysteries, like many events in the Smash community. Why is making a comparison to 9/11 "wild" in this case? Am I using 9/11 to insult you in a derogatory manner? | |||
:::::::Saying "xxx is true because the community believes it" is different from saying "a large amount of the community believes that xxx is true." [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 23:42, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::::::''"It appears to me that you're the only user who's removing anything that has to deal with community opinion."'' | |||
::::::::It appears to me that you're the only user who's pushing it so vehemently. Pointless argument. | |||
:::::::::''"It is a fact, however, that there are many people who think..."'' | |||
::::::::Uh-huh, and your sources for statement like that are...? This is what I mean by blindly appealing to "the community" as some monolithic opinion is pointless. Facts are things you can cite. Do you have a means of demonstrating that "many people" is notable? Do you have a means of demonstrating that they say so in the first place? In contrast to something like a ruleset which is demonstrably used in major tournaments, which are demonstrably major in numerical terms like attendees, pot size, and viewer count? Do I have to spell it out in even more basic terms? | |||
:::::::::''"Did you know that those who work hard are the most successful in life? People who call others "blowhards" or "try-hards" are usually people who are jealous that they're not as successful in life."'' | |||
::::::::Am I actually reading this drivel? Is this some sort of satire I'm not getting? Because honestly, this is sounding less and less like "I am trying to have a reasonable discussion of wiki policy" and more like you're just trying to be an annoyance. It's rather tiring. And I know what's going to happen. You're going to see this post and do a point-by-point rebuttal, again and again, until I stop replying because of the sheer redundancy of it. And then you'll say you "won" because I stopped arguing, or whine at me again for not debating you the way you want. To me, that is proof positive that you are more interested in your own words than in their content. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 23:55, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::::::''"It appears to me that you're the only user who's pushing it so vehemently. Pointless argument."'' | |||
:::::::::Read all the shit OT (the best player on this wiki) has laid out for you if you want someone else's input on this. Several other users interested in the competitive scene have added information regarding the community's opinion on things. Meanwhile, you continue to be the only user here vehemently trying to shut this down. | |||
:::::::::''"Facts are things you can cite. Do you have a means of demonstrating that "many people" is notable? Do you have a means of demonstrating that they say so in the first place?"'' | |||
:::::::::Go on the internet and read the articles of your professional smashers or other community members. The opinions of someone who is knowledgeable about the subject are valid citations. Places like Wikipedia and other news publications use this. If you want evidence on something like the VGBC incident [http://smashboards.com/threads/vgbootcamp-regarding-project-m.390087/ read this article on Smashboards], and look at how the comments section has exploded. Look up some more on places like reddit if you want to look deeper into this. Why should we believe anything on the internet if numbers are the only valid citations? | |||
:::::::::''"Am I actually reading this drivel? Is this some sort of satire I'm not getting? Because honestly, this is sounding less and less like "I am trying to have a reasonable discussion of wiki policy" and more like you're just trying to be an annoyance."'' | |||
:::::::::If you're going to say that I'm being a "blow-hard," then I'm going to defend myself for my actions. If you don't want me to do that, you don't have to accuse me of being a blow-hard. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 00:35, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::::::::::If the extent of your argument is "read comments sections on SmashBoards and Reddit", that's not even close to convincing. That's just a pile of opinions, some by people who are relevant but overwhelmingly by people whose opinions are generally speaking inconsequential to this wiki. Let me know if you have any actual citations to back yourself up that have factual credibility. Otherwise you are wasting your time and mine. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 00:44, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::::::::''"That's just a pile of opinions, some by people who are relevant but overwhelmingly by people whose opinions are generally speaking inconsequential to this wiki."'' | |||
:::::::::::It's okay if only a small amount of the people's opinions matter. Scientists make up a very small percentage of the world population, yet they are still most trusted sources for knowledge in the community. Plus isn't it still notable to list the opinions of the general public as well when significant? | |||
:::::::::::If you really want a bunch of sources, here they are. Read them to your leisure. [http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/dec/18/mew2king-covers-why-he-thinks-diddy-kong-only-second-best-character-super-smash-bros-4-whos-number-one-and-more-video-interview/ Mew2King's Opinions on Smash 4] [http://www.reddit.com/r/smashbros/comments/280mk9/hey_im_zero_e3_smash_bros_invitational_champion/ ZeRo's Ask Me Anything] [http://smashboards.com/threads/rom-5-mew2king-vs-unknown522.329934/ Juggleguy's opinions on RoM] [http://www.reddit.com/r/smashbros/comments/2q6cnj/mew2king_just_made_two_facebook_posts_towards_the/ M2K's opinions on a bunch of Smash 4 issues] [http://www.reddit.com/r/smashbros/comments/2at4dk/c9_mang0_ama/ Mang0's AMA] [https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=t0p0_F3ajd8 M2K on Brawl] | |||
:::::::::::Seriously dude, just look up a news article or YouTube video featuring an interview of a pro player. Read through an Ask Me Anything on reddit and you'll find a lot of opinions by prominent members of the community. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 01:29, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::::::::::::And those aren't unanimous enough to warrant mention in the mainspace. But thank you for providing actual evidence for once. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 01:36, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::::::::::Why does it have to be unanimous? Just because not 100% of the community agrees on a topic, doesn't mean that it's not significant and shouldn't be mentioned. Perhaps the community is divided into two or three different opinions on something, yet that can still be considered a widespread belief. Is this really the argument you have for shutting this down? If you were actually part of the community and knew what you were doing, you would know about this "evidence" created by pro players and I wouldn't have to go digging through everything myself. Your actions have still proven to me that you do not know much about the competitive community, so please don't edit things you don't know much about. We've told this to plenty of users who were adding a bunch of dumb trivia to every article, as well as users who kept adding people to the "notable players" section when they weren't really that notable after all. Why can't you be like them for a change? [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 07:34, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::::::::::Please thoroughly read through the Ridley discussion and see what happened there. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 07:44, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
If we're talking about [http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=List_of_community_controversies&curid=55571&diff=654803&oldid=654802 this edit], then I agree that it's too speculatory, as I do not recall "block Melee and feature Brawl because Nintendo hates competitives" as being the primary sentiment at the time of that controversy. Maybe I'm remembering wrong, but it sure seems too much. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Glow 21:47, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:If you think there's not enough widespread community opinion on a certain topic, that would be an acceptable reason not to list community opinion in an article. Fair enough. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 22:53, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::Yeah, if your going to cite "community opinion" as a source, make sure it's actually community opinion (and also reasonable). There's a variety of reasons Nintendo could have tried to shut the game's streaming down, including the fact that it was a video of their game they didn't receive money from or that they didn't want their characters portrayed in such a violent way in the mainstream, both of which are just as if not more common theories in the community from what I've heard. There's too many "theories" to call one "community consensus" in this case and none have enough evidence to even be considered reporting here. '''''[[User:Dr. Pain 99|<font color=navy>D<font color=#190080>o<font color=#310080>c<font color=#490080>t<font color=#620080>o<font color=purple>rP</font>a</font>i</font>n</font>9</font>9</font>]]''''' 00:06, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
== Stay out of stuff you know absolutely nothing about. == | |||
[http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Diddy_Kong_(SSB4)&curid=40986&diff=655060&oldid=655058 Your] [http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Sheik_(SSB4)&curid=42422&diff=655061&oldid=655059 edits] [http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Diddy_Kong_(SSB4)&curid=40986&diff=655062&oldid=655060 to these articles] have shown to me that you have terrible judgmental skills and know nothing about the Smash community. Your preferred version of the paragraph is vague and unspecific, leaving out lots of important details. Saying "Diddy Kong is considered the best character in the game" is much more clear and specific than saying "Diddy Kong is a dominant force in the metagame." You completely removed the line about Diddy Kong being dominant in tournaments, when he has taken top spots at Apex 2015 and several other nationals. You also completely removed the part about people wanting Diddy Kong to be banned, saying that "people aren't being serious about it." To me this shows that you have absolutely no idea what's been going on in the community. [http://smashboards.com/threads/is-diddy-kong-really-the-problem-of-smash-4.388297/ Here's] [http://smashboards.com/threads/wes-talks-bans-with-smash-on-blast.390141/ some] [http://www.reddit.com/r/smashbros/comments/2nfbrk/already_talks_about_a_diddy_kong_ban/ nice] [http://kotaku.com/why-hardcore-smash-bros-cant-stand-diddy-kong-right-no-1676097957 information] for you to show you how big of a deal this has become, and that it's a widespread belief that Diddy is the best character in the game and there's a ton of controversy over banning him. You can find similar stuff for people saying Sheik is one of the best characters. You also removed a ton of information, claiming that the new version was "more neutral," yet the previous version was written in a neutral tone and point of view. What was the old version being biased towards? Am I missing something here? If you ask me, the newer versions have the same level of "neutrality" as the old version, as they both claim the characters are really good and dominant, yet your versions are just a lot less specific with fewer detail and encyclopedic content. Dots' version is definitely a lot better than yours, as he clarifies that these results are only preliminary and the metagame could change over time, while you just made the page less specific while removing a bunch of 100% true information. | |||
If you really know a lot about the community, I shouldn't be having to show you all the evidence to "prove" to you widespread and common opinions in the Smash scene. You have been told this many times, and you completely ignored my last comment about this as well. Please stay out of the competitive sections of this wiki, because you keep fucking things up whenever you make an edit. Several users have called you out on this already; can you please do some self-reflection? If you want people to stop berating you, then change actions to show that you've improved and know what you're talking about. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 19:50, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:Why report on opinions when we can describe the same information with a factual basis? I've made it clear to you countless times: '''the wiki does not prioritize community opinion over facts'''. If you are unwilling to comprehend this incredibly basic fact and would rather dump walls of text on my talk page repeatedly, you have no place editing this wiki. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 20:15, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::You know, community opinion ≠ fact. Something that is widespread and believed by a lot of people doesn't mean it's written in stone. Reading through all you've had to say, it honestly seems like '''''you''''' are the only one who holds these opinions. [[File:AidanzapunkSignaturesmall.PNG]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan the'''</span>]] [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aura Master'''</span>]] 20:34, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::You are once again completely misunderstanding what I say. '''Reporting''' on the community's opinion is '''fact'''. Stating the reaction of the community, without clearly stating which side of the community you agree with, is a '''fact''' and is definitely not an opinion. Aidan you clearly did not read what I wrote either. It is '''''not''''' a fact that Diddy Kong is the best character in the game. It is a fact that '''''many people in the community think that Diddy Kong is the best character in the game.''''' There is definitely a "factual basis," get your facts by looking at what people in the community are saying. My previous version of the article is not only 100% fact, it provides much more detail and specificity than your version. Several other prominent members of the wiki, including OT, the best Smash player here, have written tons of content featuring the community's opinion on everything. How many times have I told you this? You once again completely ignored the whole paragraph at the bottom I wrote about ignoring what people say to you. Did you even read the Ridley discussion or that whole time last year when you laughably came crying to Toomai complaining that OT was being "mean?" Why are you so fucking dense? [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 20:51, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::You know what I love about your arguments? You never actually seem to have your own proof. You're always saying, "hey, look at what _______ has to say, and believe it, because they are higher up than you". And plus, who has time to read what you have to say, when you just type up a wall of text for you to hide behind? | |||
:::I honestly don't want to get into a huge ass argument. All I'm trying to say is "hey, some people don't believe what you think, so buck up and face the facts for once." [[File:AidanzapunkSignaturesmall.PNG]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan the'''</span>]] [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aura Master'''</span>]] 20:54, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::::I just want to make sure that you understand the difference between a fact and an opinion. I also use evidence the professional players because these are the only people that Miles seems to trust and believe in. People who are knowledgeable about a subject are usually trusted in terms of information about that subject. The fact that people have different ideas compared to me is completely irrelevant to whether their views are correct or not, and that shouldn't stop from trying to defend and undo a dumb decision made by and administrator. You can criticize me for using wall of text if you want. However, don't expect things to go in your favor if your opponent has a ton of points to say about the subject, and you refuse to refute anything he says. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 21:02, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::You know, a user [http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Mario_(universe)&curid=2999&diff=655074&oldid=654678 just made this edit], in which he edited a section stating that Mario is considered the most famous video game character. The section that the user edited was entirely concerned about the community's opinion on video game characters. If SmashWiki is to completely disregard the community's opinion on everything, why didn't you remove that section of the article as well? You are quick to remove anything that has to do with the competitive scene, yet you're completely okay with something dealing with the casual fanbase; to me, this shows that you only want to remove anything to do with competitive Smash from the wiki, and you only apply your "rules" and "policies" to things that you don't like. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 21:02, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::::You didn't read the entire section. It states, and I quote: | |||
::::''"...he is more popular to Americans than other very well known characters like [[Sonic]], [[Mega Man]], Bugs Bunny, Mickey Mouse, Superman, Batman, Spider-Man and Captain America."'' | |||
::::That's not the community. That's a '''survey''' conducted by someone other than a Smash player. | |||
::::''"The fact that people have different ideas compared to me is completely irrelevant to whether their views are correct or not."'' | |||
::::Are you really ''that'' errogant? You're basically saying "they have different opinions, but they're wrong because it's not what I think." I really have nothing to say about that. [[File:AidanzapunkSignaturesmall.PNG]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan the'''</span>]] [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aura Master'''</span>]] 21:07, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::''"That's not the community. That's a '''survey''' conducted by someone other than a Smash player."'' | |||
:::::If you're going to use a survey as a source, the survey must be done reliably and you need a link to it. | |||
:::::''"Are you really ''that'' errogant? You're basically saying "they have different opinions, but they're wrong because it's not what I think." I really have nothing to say about that."'' | |||
:::::That is not what I meant at all. Read about the fallacy {{s|wikipedia|I'm entitled to my opinion}}. You can have your opinion about something, but saying "I'm entitled to my opinion" has nothing to do with the validity of your opinion. You can claim "Miles has his own opinion so leave him alone," but that is irrelevant to whether Miles' opinion is correct or incorrect. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 21:12, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::::::My opinion also happens to align with SmashWiki's policy on style and content. If your opinion is so radically different that you find the two incompatible, you're free to take your efforts elsewhere. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 21:16, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::::So now you're going to cry "I'm entitled to my own opinion! Too bad!" without even presenting any arguments or discussing anything else I said? You've failed to respond this whole "we report on what the community thinks" debate multiple times now. I presented an argument comparing this to historical events, where it's helpful to present information about the public's reaction, and you went on to ignore what I said and tried to make me look like a bad person for using 9/11 as an example. That shows to me that you haven't responded to what I said. During the Ridley discussion, after OT presented a bunch of arguments, you ignored everything he said and started asking everyone else for their input instead of attempting to refute his points. | |||
:::::::Once again, you completely ignored what I said about staying away from topics you don't know much about. Do you see why people think you're a bad admin? A good admin should hold themselves responsible for their own mistakes. Don't be a coward. Either own up to what you did wrong and don't do it again, or improve your knowledge of the competitive scene before you start touching this section of the wiki again. | |||
:::::::It's true that you're entitled to your opinion. But seeing how the talk page discussions have gone against you and you're refusing to debate the issue anymore, you are not the one who gets to make the final decision and do it all your way. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 23:15, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::::::::Since you still don't seem to get it: '''"we report on what the community thinks" is not a primary goal of SmashWiki and you need to stop treating it as such.''' There have been times I have made mistakes in regard to this wiki's competitive content, but this is not one of them. I have made a concerted effort to keep myself informed. You are over the line in terms of [[SW:NPA]] and are clogging my talk page and recent changes with pointless bickering. This will be my last reply to you on the subject, since I have no intention of encouraging your endless desire for baseless criticism. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 23:27, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::::::What reasoning do you have to support the notion that "we report on what the community thinks" is not a primary goal of SmashWiki? Haven't you debated this issue already and clearly came out on the bottom on multiple occasions? Are you just supporting this because [http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-tradition.html it's been the "status quo?"] There's a reason why the SmashWiki policies can be changed, you know. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 23:33, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
<small>(Reset indent) </small>You know, that's what sets opinions apart from facts: they're neither wrong nor right. That's what makes them ''opinions''. [[File:AidanzapunkSignaturesmall.PNG]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan the'''</span>]] [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aura Master'''</span>]] 21:21, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:You can have your opinion, but that doesn't always mean your opinion is the right one. [https://www.google.com/#q=i%27m+entitled+to+my+opinion+fallacy Look up more information about the fallacy if Wikipedia is too hard to understand]. I'll make up an example to show you what the fallacy is. Suppose that there's a group of people who believe that all rocks are living, breathing organisms. They continue to believe that rocks are living no matter what anyone tells them. Scientists all over the globe come up with new research and examination of the structure of rock and conclude that there are no signs of living organisms or cells in rocks. The living-rock people see all this information and what everyone is telling them, but they continue to shrug them off, saying things like, "I just believe that rocks are living creatures," or "I'm entitled to my opinion on whether rocks are living or not. Leave me alone." Even though it's pretty clear in this case that there is an overwhelming amount of evidence supporting the fact that rocks are not living, they still continue to say, "I'm entitled to my opinion." That's basically the fallacy right there. Although it's true that the believers can have their opinion on the issue if they want, saying "I'm entitled to my opinion" does nothing to support their argument and prove their point. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 23:15, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::I will not deny that fallacy is a mistaken belief. But what I also won't deny is that opinions, at its true definition, are [http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/opinion not meant to be factual]. People believe what they ''want'' to believe. And you believe that Miles has no background knowledge on the competitive community, when, in actuality, he knows damn well what he's doing. | |||
::This isn't SmashBoards. This is an encyclopedia. If people want knowledge about competitive crap, then sure, they can find stuff here, but if they want all the widespread opinions in the community, then they can drag themselves over [http://smashboards.com/ here]. | |||
::I'm not taking Miles's side in this argument, nor am I taking yours, Ac2k; I'm just trying to settle this argument by acting as a third party candidate. [[File:AidanzapunkSignaturesmall.PNG]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan the'''</span>]] [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aura Master'''</span>]] 23:29, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::''"But what I also won't deny is that opinions, at its true definition, are not meant to be factual."'' | |||
:::It's true that opinions aren't supposed to be factual. But you can advocate your opinion to show why it is the better opinion. Do you know what a debate is? | |||
:::''"And you believe that Miles has no background knowledge on the competitive community, when, in actuality, he knows damn well what he's doing."'' | |||
:::You are clearly mistaken if you believe this. On the Diddy Kong edit summary, he said that "people weren't serious about banning Diddy Kong," when the truth is, this is a major issue in the Smash 4 community. I linked a bunch of discussions on the internet in this section showing how this has blown up in the community. If you look at past archives of his talk page, you can see that he once refused to allow the creation of an article that was important to the competitive Smash 64 community because he thought the name was inappropriate, when SmashWiki is not censored. There are countless other examples showing his incompetence. | |||
:::''"This isn't SmashBoards. This is an encyclopedia. If people want knowledge about competitive crap, then sure, they can find stuff here, but if they want all the widespread opinions in the community, then they can drag themselves over [http://smashboards.com/ here]."'' | |||
:::Reception and reaction from the community has always been an important part of an encyclopedic article. Nearly every article about a product or historical event on Wikipedia has one. Smashboards has always been notoriously difficult to find information from, since the search engines there are broken and you have to dig through so much unrelated content to find what you actually need. | |||
:::''"I'm not taking Miles's side in this argument, nor am I taking yours, Ac2k; I'm just trying to settle this argument by acting as a third party candidate. "'' | |||
:::Saying "It's okay for you guys to both have different opinions, so leave each other alone," is the worst way to "settle" an argument. If we use that mentality all the time, nothing will ever get changed here if the administrators can do whatever they want since nobody's allowed to argue with them. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 09:07, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::::You know what, Ac2k? It seems to me that you think that '''you're the only one who's right here'''. And you know what? You're ''wrong''. People don't have to do what you say because you think it's wrong. I don't even know why I wanted to bring myself into this argument, and considering how I played a fair role in [[Talk:Tier list/Archive 7#Smash 4 tier list|this long discussion]], I do not want a repeat. I don't see what it will take for you to see that '''not everyone ''has'' to agree with you'''. [[File:AidanzapunkSignaturesmall.PNG]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan the'''</span>]] [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aura Master'''</span>]] 10:58, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::Why are you going to tell me that I'm wrong without providing any reasoning for it? Saying "He can have is own opinion so leave him alone!" and baselessly telling people "You're wrong so shut up!" is a poor form of moderating a dispute that adds nothing constructive and will lead to you getting dragged into a discussion that you don't need to get involved in. If your going to tell me that I'm wrong about this, respond to some of points I said. | |||
:::::You don't have to agree with me if you don't want to. But you don't get to decide the outcome if you don't respond to the points people say. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 13:28, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::::I'm not really going to take any side here (and hopefully I don't want to see this discussion ever again in my personal opinion) but I noticed that you've been kinda quite rude lately in discussions. Sure Miles maybe ignorant about the competitive play and other true information but he's trying to do his job. So no, I wouldn't say Miles is completely at fault here. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] The Penguin 11:27, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::You should only moderate a section of this wiki if you are knowledgable about that subject. I think that there are better people to be in charge of edits regarding the competitive scene. OT has the best knowledge about the competitive community by far out of all the admins, and thus he should be in charge of moderating the competitive scene here. If he's inactive, that should be the responsibility of someone like you, me, Brian, PMJ3, or other users knowledgeable about the competitive scene. I hate to keep bringing up this issue, but Miles hasn't shown much improvement in areas he was criticized for over a year ago. He continues to make big decisions, yet refuses to respond to anyone when they discuss it with him. He still messes with information dealing with the competitive community, yet hasn't shown much improvement in knowledge of the scene. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 13:28, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
<small>(Reset indent) </small> <nowiki>*</nowiki>points finger* And there's your flaw. Right there. | |||
''"OT has the best knowledge about the competitive community by far out of all the admins, and thus he should be in charge of moderating the competitive scene here."'' | |||
Yes, he may have the best knowledge on the subject, but to me, that sounds like "all information has to be run by OT before it's put up". And the reason why it's a flaw for you is because [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Ownership of articles|no one "owns" an article]]. [[File:AidanzapunkSignaturesmall.PNG]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan the'''</span>]] [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aura Master'''</span>]] 13:41, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:That's how moderation works. When someone makes an edit on the wiki, the people in charge read through the article and remove any information that's incorrect or they disagree with. But if you don't know much about a subject and can't be trusted to verify the accuracy of certain content, you leave it to someone who is more knowledgable and can give a better analysis. That's part of working a job; leave things you don't understand to someone who can do it for you. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 14:28, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:@Ack2k: Even if if someone is not an expert on the scene, they can still fix obviously wrong things. Some of your edits that Miles reverted were beyond obviously speculatory to everyone I've talked to or simply did not belong on the page in question. Stop acting like Miles is the big bad admin who's against everyone else who's "knowledgeable" about competitive play when thats not even the issue here and there's people perfectly "knowledgeable" who do not share your side on this issue. '''''[[User:Dr. Pain 99|<font color=navy>D<font color=#190080>o<font color=#310080>c<font color=#490080>t<font color=#620080>o<font color=purple>rP</font>a</font>i</font>n</font>9</font>9</font>]]''''' 13:47, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::If I made mistakes on the article, fine. I added a bunch of stuff that was really speculatory and shouldn't be there. Maybe I shouldn't be editing the competitive sections of the wiki. But Miles should not be touching things like "Many people think that Diddy should be banned" when anyone who is competitively knowledgeable knows that's true. Miles' idea that "SmashWiki does not prioritize community opinions" is unhealthy for the wiki. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 14:28, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::''"Miles' idea that "SmashWiki does not prioritize community opinions" is unhealthy for the wiki."'' | |||
:::Ok, that's a personal attack if I ever saw one. Knock it off. [[File:AidanzapunkSignaturesmall.PNG]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan the'''</span>]] [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aura Master'''</span>]] 14:39, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::::You clearly have no idea what constitutes a personal attack or what our policy on personal attacks is. A personal attack is when you call someone an offensive or derogatory name to insult them. Criticizing another user or their abilities or their opinion of something is definitely not a personal attack. Sure I criticized his opinions, but did I use an offensive term to insult him? No. If I said something like, "Miles is a moron because he believes that we shouldn't report on the community's reaction," that would definitely be a personal attack because I called him a moron. That was not the case here. Read [[SW:NPA|the policy]] before you accuse anyone of using a personal attack, and make sure you thoroughly understand the wiki's policies before accusing anyone of violating them. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 18:08, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
Don't forget to read through the [[Talk:List of Director's Room Miiverse posts/Archive 2#Regarding speculation|Miiverse posts]] argument as well as the [[Talk:Ridley#"Speculation"|Ridley]] debate. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 18:42, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:It has personally come to my attention that you think that Miles is the main antagonist of SmashWiki and despite being an admin, he is unintentionally trying to make it a worse place. Miles was simply trying to remove things that weren't necessarily true, so quite honestly, he isn't always wrong and was trying to simply do what's right. Also, you seem to treat OT as "the main protagonist of SmashWiki" and that everything on SmashWiki should centralize on what he or the top professionals say in terms of their thoughts and not on facts. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] The Windows 19:28, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::I know that Miles isn't intentionally trying to harm the wiki, but when he reverts edits saying things like "People aren't serious about banning Diddy Kong," it appears to me that his edits to the competitive scene overall do more bad than good. I look up to OT and other top professionals for competitive information because they are knowledgeable about the competitive scene, and out of all the admins on this wiki, OT is the most knowledgeable about the competitive community. People who know a lot about a subject are generally trusted for information regarding that subject, and OT should be trusted for moderating SmashWiki's articles on the competitive community because he knows most about it. If you want your facts, the other information unrelated to the competitive community can still be on the page; I just think that it's important to cover the community's response to certain events and topics, in addition to what else is already there in the article. I hope that Miles will listen to what people have been telling him about his responsibilities as a staff member. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 19:59, 15 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
== Something to keep in mind... == | |||
...You might wanna archive this page soon. Just saying. [[File:AidanzapunkSignaturesmall.PNG]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan the'''</span>]] [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aura Master'''</span>]] 20:58, 14 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
== What are you doing? == | |||
You have just been involved in a long discussion that you now refuse to comment on, and are debating an issue that was brought multiple times already, and now you are going still revert the changes anyways? And your reason for removing the content was "inapplicable," what kind of bullshit is that? You are truly a terrible, awful admin. Someone who's held this position for over six years should know better than this. Look, if you're not going to comment on the discussion, you do not get to make the decision on the final outcome. How dense and stubborn can you be? What kind of wiki is this where we let [[SW:ADMIN#Administrators are not kings|admins go around doing whatever they want]] with no one being allowed to challenge them? [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 20:44, 17 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:There is unanimous opposition to your edits by both the administration and the rest of the userbase. Stop assuming you get priority over everyone else. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 20:46, 17 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::At least tell me that then, instead of saying things like "your edit is inapplicable." When did a pure vote count decide the outcome of things on here anyways? [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 20:48, 17 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::I do not assume I have to tell you how to read the discussion you are part of. I assume you are smart enough to realize things like "everybody here disagrees with me". And wikis are not a pure voting-based system, but if there is unanimous consensus aside from one vocal user, that is more than sufficient to come to a conclusion. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 20:51, 17 March 2015 (EDT) | |||