SmashWiki

User talk:Miles of SmashWiki/Archive14: Difference between revisions

User page Discussion

User talk:Miles of SmashWiki/Archive14 (view source)

Revision as of 19:51, March 14, 2015

3,181 bytes removed ,  10 years ago
m
Undid edit by Ac2k:
m (Undid edit by Ac2k:)
Line 364: Line 364:
[http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Diddy_Kong_(SSB4)&curid=40986&diff=655060&oldid=655058 Your] [http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Sheik_(SSB4)&curid=42422&diff=655061&oldid=655059 edits] [http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Diddy_Kong_(SSB4)&curid=40986&diff=655062&oldid=655060 to these articles] have shown to me that you have terrible judgmental skills and know nothing about the Smash community. Your preferred version of the paragraph is vague and unspecific, leaving out lots of important details. Saying "Diddy Kong is considered the best character in the game" is much more clear and specific than saying "Diddy Kong is a dominant force in the metagame." You completely removed the line about Diddy Kong being dominant in tournaments, when he has taken top spots at Apex 2015 and several other nationals. You also completely removed the part about people wanting Diddy Kong to be banned, saying that "people aren't being serious about it." To me this shows that you have absolutely no idea what's been going on in the community. [http://smashboards.com/threads/is-diddy-kong-really-the-problem-of-smash-4.388297/ Here's] [http://smashboards.com/threads/wes-talks-bans-with-smash-on-blast.390141/ some] [http://www.reddit.com/r/smashbros/comments/2nfbrk/already_talks_about_a_diddy_kong_ban/ nice] [http://kotaku.com/why-hardcore-smash-bros-cant-stand-diddy-kong-right-no-1676097957 information] for you to show you how big of a deal this has become, and that it's a widespread belief that Diddy is the best character in the game and there's a ton of controversy over banning him. You can find similar stuff for people saying Sheik is one of the best characters. You also removed a ton of information, claiming that the new version was "more neutral," yet the previous version was written in a neutral tone and point of view. What was the old version being biased towards? Am I missing something here? If you ask me, the newer versions have the same level of "neutrality" as the old version, as they both claim the characters are really good and dominant, yet your versions are just a lot less specific with fewer detail and encyclopedic content. Dots' version is definitely a lot better than yours, as he clarifies that these results are only preliminary and the metagame could change over time, while you just made the page less specific while removing a bunch of 100% true information.
[http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Diddy_Kong_(SSB4)&curid=40986&diff=655060&oldid=655058 Your] [http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Sheik_(SSB4)&curid=42422&diff=655061&oldid=655059 edits] [http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Diddy_Kong_(SSB4)&curid=40986&diff=655062&oldid=655060 to these articles] have shown to me that you have terrible judgmental skills and know nothing about the Smash community. Your preferred version of the paragraph is vague and unspecific, leaving out lots of important details. Saying "Diddy Kong is considered the best character in the game" is much more clear and specific than saying "Diddy Kong is a dominant force in the metagame." You completely removed the line about Diddy Kong being dominant in tournaments, when he has taken top spots at Apex 2015 and several other nationals. You also completely removed the part about people wanting Diddy Kong to be banned, saying that "people aren't being serious about it." To me this shows that you have absolutely no idea what's been going on in the community. [http://smashboards.com/threads/is-diddy-kong-really-the-problem-of-smash-4.388297/ Here's] [http://smashboards.com/threads/wes-talks-bans-with-smash-on-blast.390141/ some] [http://www.reddit.com/r/smashbros/comments/2nfbrk/already_talks_about_a_diddy_kong_ban/ nice] [http://kotaku.com/why-hardcore-smash-bros-cant-stand-diddy-kong-right-no-1676097957 information] for you to show you how big of a deal this has become, and that it's a widespread belief that Diddy is the best character in the game and there's a ton of controversy over banning him. You can find similar stuff for people saying Sheik is one of the best characters. You also removed a ton of information, claiming that the new version was "more neutral," yet the previous version was written in a neutral tone and point of view. What was the old version being biased towards? Am I missing something here? If you ask me, the newer versions have the same level of "neutrality" as the old version, as they both claim the characters are really good and dominant, yet your versions are just a lot less specific with fewer detail and encyclopedic content. Dots' version is definitely a lot better than yours, as he clarifies that these results are only preliminary and the metagame could change over time, while you just made the page less specific while removing a bunch of 100% true information.


If you really know a lot about the community, I shouldn't be having to show you all the evidence to "prove" to you widespread and common opinions in the Smash scene. You have been told this many times, and you completely ignored my last comment about this as well. Please stay out of the competitive sections of this wiki, because you keep fucking things up whenever you make an edit. Several users have called you out on this already; can you please do some self-reflection? [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 19:50, 14 March 2015 (EDT)
If you really know a lot about the community, I shouldn't be having to show you all the evidence to "prove" to you widespread and common opinions in the Smash scene. You have been told this many times, and you completely ignored my last comment about this as well. Please stay out of the competitive sections of this wiki, because you keep fucking things up whenever you make an edit. Several users have called you out on this already; can you please do some self-reflection? If you want people to stop berating you, then change actions to show that you've improved and know what you're talking about. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 19:50, 14 March 2015 (EDT)
 
== Stay out of stuff you know absolutely nothing about. ==
 
[http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Diddy_Kong_(SSB4)&curid=40986&diff=655060&oldid=655058 Your] [http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Sheik_(SSB4)&curid=42422&diff=655061&oldid=655059 edits] [http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Diddy_Kong_(SSB4)&curid=40986&diff=655062&oldid=655060 to these articles] have shown to me that you have terrible judgmental skills and know nothing about the Smash community. Your preferred version of the paragraph is vague and unspecific, leaving out lots of important details. Saying "Diddy Kong is considered the best character in the game" is much more clear and specific than saying "Diddy Kong is a dominant force in the metagame." You completely removed the line about Diddy Kong being dominant in tournaments, when he has taken top spots at Apex 2015 and several other nationals. You also completely removed the part about people wanting Diddy Kong to be banned, saying that "people aren't being serious about it." To me this shows that you have absolutely no idea what's been going on in the community. [http://smashboards.com/threads/is-diddy-kong-really-the-problem-of-smash-4.388297/ Here's] [http://smashboards.com/threads/wes-talks-bans-with-smash-on-blast.390141/ some] [http://www.reddit.com/r/smashbros/comments/2nfbrk/already_talks_about_a_diddy_kong_ban/ nice] [http://kotaku.com/why-hardcore-smash-bros-cant-stand-diddy-kong-right-no-1676097957 information] for you to show you how big of a deal this has become, and that it's a widespread belief that Diddy is the best character in the game and there's a ton of controversy over banning him. You can find similar stuff for people saying Sheik is one of the best characters. You also removed a ton of information, claiming that the new version was "more neutral," yet the previous version was written in a neutral tone and point of view. What was the old version being biased towards? Am I missing something here? If you ask me, the newer versions have the same level of "neutrality" as the old version, as they both claim the characters are really good and dominant, yet your versions are just a lot less specific with fewer detail and encyclopedic content. Dots' version is definitely a lot better than yours, as he clarifies that these results are only preliminary and the metagame could change over time, while you just made the page less specific while removing a bunch of 100% true information.
 
If you really know a lot about the community, I shouldn't be having to show you all the evidence to "prove" to you widespread and common opinions in the Smash scene. You have been told this many times, and you completely ignored my last comment about this as well. Please stay out of the competitive sections of this wiki, because you keep fucking things up whenever you make an edit. Several users have called you out on this already; can you please do some self-reflection? If you want people to stop berating you, then change your actions to show that you've improved and know what your talking about. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 19:50, 14 March 2015 (EDT)
Ac2k
Rollbackers
6,225

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.ssbwiki.com/Special:MobileDiff/655079"