SmashWiki talk:New game procedure (original): Difference between revisions
SmashWiki talk:New game procedure (original) (edit)
Revision as of 22:51, August 28, 2014
, 10 years ago→Leaks are not trustworthy sources / Considering recent leaks got video footage.
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
How about this - let's just let this debate lie, follow the policy as set out now, and if the leak does end up being fake, as it may or may not be proven in just over 2 weeks, then remove the content and have all those crying out fake feel smug about themselves. Because this is seriously getting old now. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 08:16, 28 August 2014 (EDT) | How about this - let's just let this debate lie, follow the policy as set out now, and if the leak does end up being fake, as it may or may not be proven in just over 2 weeks, then remove the content and have all those crying out fake feel smug about themselves. Because this is seriously getting old now. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 08:16, 28 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
:Just because a debate has been going on for a while doesn't mean that it should be stopped just because it's "getting old now". <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px]] 11:30, 28 August 2014 (EDT) | :Just because a debate has been going on for a while doesn't mean that it should be stopped just because it's "getting old now". <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px]] 11:30, 28 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
If the Paterson footage was without a shadow of a doubt replicatable by a human, but we still had no intact evidence or bodies and such of a Bigfoot, would Bigfoot by considered scientifically real? No, as there is no confirmation or proof. It's irrelevant whether or not it's convincing, as a wiki they shouldn't be here until they are confirmed. You guys are missing the point.[[Special:Contributions/142.177.93.149|142.177.93.149]] 22:51, 28 August 2014 (EDT) | |||