User talk:Omega Tyrant/Clone charts: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
I'll discuss this more later after I've gone in to training mode for a refresher, but I don't see how you can call Ganondorf a clone in brawl when they have LESS similiarities, according to your chart, than Mario and Luigi. Also, having different damage or knockback does NOT mean they're not "cloned" moves if they share the exact same (or nearly the same) hitboxes and animations. I'm almost certain that Toon Link and Link share at least 16 of their 22 moves (17/23 if you count z-air)- [[Special:Contributions/71.87.116.224|71.87.116.224]] 02:39, 15 June 2013 (EDT) | I'll discuss this more later after I've gone in to training mode for a refresher, but I don't see how you can call Ganondorf a clone in brawl when they have LESS similiarities, according to your chart, than Mario and Luigi. Also, having different damage or knockback does NOT mean they're not "cloned" moves if they share the exact same (or nearly the same) hitboxes and animations. I'm almost certain that Toon Link and Link share at least 16 of their 22 moves (17/23 if you count z-air)- [[Special:Contributions/71.87.116.224|71.87.116.224]] 02:39, 15 June 2013 (EDT) | ||
:I would also like to know why Lucas and Ness are listed together when "Lucas's standard attacks are unique with the exception of his forward smash and up aerial". Being "similar in mechanics" means nothing. Pretty much every Forward Smash knocks characters the same general direction, and most moves of a given type (back aerial, dash attack, etc) are going to be "similar in mechanics" no matter who uses them - [[Special:Contributions/71.87.116.224|71.87.116.224]] 02:47, 15 June 2013 (EDT) | |||