MediaWiki talk:Edittools: Difference between revisions
m (→Improvements) |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
'''Conditionally support'''. Nuking is an important tag that should be available for newcommers to the wiki to use. I see no reason why the stub and cleanup tags should be available but not nuking. [[User:Mr. Anon|<font color="grey">'''Mr. '''</font><font color="midnightblue">'''Anon'''</font>]][[File:Anon.png|23px|link=Special:Random]][[User talk:Mr. Anon|''<span style="color: black;">talk</span>'']] 16:37, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | '''Conditionally support'''. Nuking is an important tag that should be available for newcommers to the wiki to use. I see no reason why the stub and cleanup tags should be available but not nuking. [[User:Mr. Anon|<font color="grey">'''Mr. '''</font><font color="midnightblue">'''Anon'''</font>]][[File:Anon.png|23px|link=Special:Random]][[User talk:Mr. Anon|''<span style="color: black;">talk</span>'']] 16:37, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
:'''I CACHINATED MY FACE OFF'''. Nuking is so redundant, it's unreal. It's basically speedy delete, except it doesn't put the nukeable articles in a category, and it doesn't have an icon on Recent Changes. Nuke's only purpose is to put a smile on Semicolon's face, and these hypothetical new users should learn how to type <nowiki>{{D}}</nowiki>. It is a joke system, and has no place in a serious template. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="ff8c00">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="01a3c4">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 18:24, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:24, October 20, 2012
Nuking
Okay Semicolon, you've had your fun, but it's about time we got rid of the Tag for Nuking option on this template. The Nuke template itself serves no productive function on SmashWiki, as (Speedy) Delete tags are always the ones to be used on candidate pages. Having the option for nuking only disuades users from using the correct template, and also brings the template to a length which causes the list of actions to go onto a second line on some monitors/devices. Toast 
ltimatum
06:02, 24 June 2012 (EDT)
Improvements
Discuss. Toomai Glittershine 
The Incomprehensible 18:27, 18 October 2012 (EDT)
- I find this to be improvement, and it takes out the tag for nuking in the process. Support. Toast ltimatum
18:30, 18 October 2012 (EDT) - Support --Havoc48 >:D!!! 20:55, 18 October 2012 (EDT)
- I guess it could do. Dots The Cute Asian
20:56, 18 October 2012 (EDT) - Support per above The Awesome 16:22, 19 October 2012 (EDT)
Support. Nuking makes no sense. ShupaRoeh
18:10, 19 October 2012 (EDT)
Supporting will make things alot easier! (I never new what that thing at the bottom was!) The Cheese 
16:20, 20 October 2012 (EDT)
Semi barely comes around here anyway, and he only used the Nuke template thrice. It's time to move on. I support this proposal. --- ReiDemon, Author Extraordinaire, 16:24, 20 October 2012 (EDT)
Support, on one condition. I'd prefer it if the font was Arial like it is now, instead of that ugly Courier font. Of course, very few others will care. :P Air Conditioner 
I am the air con. 16:34, 20 October 2012 (EDT)
Conditionally support. Nuking is an important tag that should be available for newcommers to the wiki to use. I see no reason why the stub and cleanup tags should be available but not nuking. Mr. Anon
talk 16:37, 20 October 2012 (EDT)
- I CACHINATED MY FACE OFF. Nuking is so redundant, it's unreal. It's basically speedy delete, except it doesn't put the nukeable articles in a category, and it doesn't have an icon on Recent Changes. Nuke's only purpose is to put a smile on Semicolon's face, and these hypothetical new users should learn how to type {{D}}. It is a joke system, and has no place in a serious template. Toast ltimatum 18:24, 20 October 2012 (EDT)
