User talk:Smash Master/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

User talk:Smash Master/Archive 1 (view source)

Revision as of 13:03, May 6, 2012

2,826 bytes added , 12 years ago

→‎Brawl

Megatron1

Rollbackers

13,093

edits

@@ Line 146: / Line 146: @@
 Wanna Brawl me? [[User:RickTommy|RickTommy]] ([[User talk:RickTommy|talk]]) 20:49, 5 April 2012 (EDT)
 :Sorry, it's gonna be a busy weekend for me. <span style="font-family:Corbel; font-size:12pt">[[User:Smash Master|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Smash''']] [[User talk:Smash Master|<span style="color:darkgreen">'''Master'''</span>]]</span></span> 21:15, 5 April 2012 (EDT)
+==Couple pieces of advice==
+'''Use the preview button''' - Yah, you find too many errors between small intervals. Use the preview button so that you can find all the errors at once.
+'''Don't assume people are idiots''' - We are a Smash Wiki. We have exact info on knockback scaling and frames. Heck, we should have exact info for every single knockback, damage, and frames. Point is, Smash Wiki is striving to gather as much info on attacks as we can, since many smashers consider frame knowledge as the key to learning about the attack and it's attributes. Don't simplify stuff for no reason unless it is clearly unnecessary.
+'''Don't argue about stuff that doesn't actually matter''' - You made quite a scene yesterday on Toast's talk page. Now, let's think about it. Did you actually have to care about whether or not Toast incorrectly listed a stat? No, you should never care. Don't care so much about a flaw a user pointed out. Instead, try to fix that flaw. Toast was just referring to how you do not utilize proper spelling and grammar. Whether or not he said 100% would not matter. In the end, he was just pointing out your flaw.
+'''Don't back up claims without proper research and/or proof''' - Why do you think that falling speed is the only thing that matters when it comes to vertical endurance? Why do you think that you can just say that you're much better offline than online? You need proof and/or research for claims about the game or your skills. If you don't have proof and/or research, you can not expect people to believe you.
+'''Don't contradict yourself''' - Probably the stuff the users on Smash Wiki joke about the most. You contradict yourself a lot. I don't know how you can improve on not contradicting yourself, so you're not getting any advice on this.
+'''Don't attempt to make yourself seem better than you actually are''' - Damn, this has properly been the first issue you've had when you came to the Wiki. You want people to believe you don't suck? Don't just tell them that you're good offline. Provide actual proof, and don't use a future event to "prove" that you are good. Also, matchups do not determine how good you are. If I brawled 10 rookies at Brawl, would I be better than the guy who beat a single professional? Nope, not at all. Don't incorrectly use matchups to determine how pro you are.
+You're sorta new here, so yah, you're expected to have some flaws. However, your attitude and flaws are expected to change when users express problems with them. Change the attitude and fix the flaws. <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px|:p]] 13:03, 6 May 2012 (EDT)