16,406
edits
User:Mr. Anon/RFA voting guide: Difference between revisions
m
→Deletion: Link fix
m (New Page: In two recent RFAs, I've noticed that some voters have been giving rather poor reasons for their votes. While there is no objective methods for evaluating the quality of a vote, and there ...) |
Omega Tyrant (talk | contribs) m (→Deletion: Link fix) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===Deletion=== | ===Deletion=== | ||
When a page has been deemed by the community to be unnecessary, or when a vandal has created a page consisting of nothing of value, admins must use their deletion powers. In the former case, an admin must be able to evaluate the consensus of the community, and a candidate is best able to display this by having a history of participating in discussion concerning the deletion of a page. Many of the cases where the community has decided a page to be unnecessary is in the case of non-[[SW: | When a page has been deemed by the community to be unnecessary, or when a vandal has created a page consisting of nothing of value, admins must use their deletion powers. In the former case, an admin must be able to evaluate the consensus of the community, and a candidate is best able to display this by having a history of participating in discussion concerning the deletion of a page. Many of the cases where the community has decided a page to be unnecessary is in the case of non-[[SW:NOTE|notable]] Smasher articles. Admins should be able to have a general idea of what constitutes as a notable smasher article and what does not. Candidates who have a fair knowledge of competitive smash can display their ability to decide this. In the case of vandalism pages, candidates should have a fair history of tagging articles for speedy deletion. | ||
===Rollback=== | ===Rollback=== | ||