User talk:Charitwo

Archive 1

Hi, Charitwo. Cheezperson is banned!!!!! Can you help by contacting someone on central wikia who can unban him? thanks. Masterman Eat Turkey! 01:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia

That was me. Both the IP message and the User was me. However, I did not vandalize any article. In actuality, we had a history project on certain people (although I already told you there), and somebody who had Babur probably vandalized the article. I can't pinpoint who did it, because more than one person has Babur, and there was more than one person with a laptop (they're the school's, not ours, and therefore we can't keep, meaning we'll always use a different laptop; they're Apply laptops) in the classroom at the time. This means that more than one person used the IP at the same time. MarioGalaxy^Talk 18:44, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Ok. --Charitwo^Talk 18:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

I am capable of taking care of my own page

THanks. I do have rollback as well. --Toon Ganondorf (t c) 05:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Good for you. --Charitwo^Talk 05:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

hey

I don't think removing content from pages is allowed. And I fear I'll get banned if I undo your edit, so just letting you know. Blue Ninjakoopa^Talk 23:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Oops, sorry, I didn't know you were still ticked off. :( Blue Ninjakoopa^Talk 23:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

It was unrelated content, so he can do that.Smoreking^(T) _(c) 23:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Regardless, the speedy delete template has carried over to every one of his signiatures, so that needs to be taken care of soon. Gutripper^Speak

It's fixed. Leave my sig alone. --Charitwo^Talk 23:03, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

What

Why are you turning a smashers disscusion page into an actual page? 98.117.158.220 03:44, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Wikia has an anti-vandal IRC channel, and Charitwo lurks on it. A "bot" in the channel informs the people there whenever it thinks it has spotted a vandal edit, and when you removed all the content from Smasher talk:Dark.Pch, the bot thought you were vandalizing it. The idea is that the people on the channel then follow the link, check to see whether it's actually vandalism, then act appropriately. Charitwo missed the second step... PenguinofDeath 09:49, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

PenguinofDeath, you could first stand to be a little less of an extremely rude individual. I used to be an admin here, then left because of people like you. You need to re-evaluate yourself on some good principles like assuming good faith and civility. Second off, I don't "lurk" on the channel, I volunteer with Wikia. I along with a few other folks look after nearly 75,000 wikis for spam and vandalism. We aren't perfect and it appeared to be a discussion page from a glance (6 sections of text). I've never been a fan of the Smasher namespace in the first place, I voted against it. I'd appreciate it if you cut me some slack and not insult me on my own talk page. Thanks. --Charitwo^Talk 14:51, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

O . O wat? Firstly, the fact that you used to be an Admin here is utterly irrelevant. Secondly, I'm nothing like Randall - dude, you don't even know me, so I don't know where you got that from... Thirdly, the word "lurk" in the context "he lurks on <channel>" means that you're on it a lot of the time, and is in no way a bad thing. For example, I lurk on the SmashWiki IRC channel, and you lurk on the general Wikia channel. It has no negative connotations - if you think it does, that's simply what you infer, not what I imply. Fourthly, when did I question your good faith? Fifthly, it looked like a Smasher page (the Smasherbeta template kinda gave the game away), which a cursory glance wouldn't reveal. When I say things like that, I appreciate that you do a lot for Wikia, so it's not a dig - you're a busy guy, and you've got lots to do, so you don't have time to scrutinize every single edit flagged as vandalism. I meant no offense... PenguinofDeath 17:00, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

It came across entirely wrong, but thanks for clarifying. I do my best to make sure what I'm reverting or deleting it actually the right thing. --Charitwo^Talk 17:28, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Problems here

Excuse me, but there's a problem that I think may require wikia's assistance. In the file about Sonic's appearence in Brawl, if you place the image on a page with certain pixel sizes, it will show a very disturbing pornographic image. Is there a way wikia can fix this quickly? Mr. Anon teh awsome 03:19, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Dude, Anon, its fixed, so stop worrying about it. Doctor Pain 99 (CTE) 03:20, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Well I've tried changing the image on his SSBB page to it's regular 120 pixels, but then it showed the graphic image. Mr. Anon teh awsome 17:54, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

I tried resizing the image on various Sonic pages to various sizes and could not get the pornographic image to show up. It is gone. Doctor Pain 99 (CTE) 17:59, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

[[Special:Contact]] Charitwo^Talk 02:56, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Yo

Removing talk page content is against policy. ƋoӄԏoяΠɛəи99 _{ROLLBACKER} 23:07, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

I am not a member of the community here and do not wish for my userspace to show up in google search. --Charitwo (talk) 23:08, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

The rules are the rules. ƋoӄԏoяΠɛəи99 _{ROLLBACKER} 23:11, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

Guess what? You're not an admin, I used to be an admin. Buzz off :) --Charitwo (talk) 23:12, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

First of all, your statement is irrelevant, as admins are not kings, and do not control the Wiki. Second, even if it was, you are not an admin anymore so zzzz. This isn't Wikia and you can't control us, nor do you own your userpage or talk page. Read this. Deleting thiis page is against policy, as we like to keep a record of all that happened on this Wiki, even before it was moved. ƋoӄԏoяΠɛəи99 _{ROLLBACKER} 23:15, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

Please read this and this. These are special categories. --C 23:26, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

I will not fight you on this, because it's not worth my time and effort and isn't against any policy I know of, and it should be OK with everyone here. However, you do have to reply to talk page comments on the talk page they were originally posted on. ƋoӄԏoяΠɛəи99 _{ROLLBACKER} 23:30, 16 September 2011 (EDT)