Forum talk:Smash Arena/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

m
Line 97: Line 97:


The intent of re-introducing half-votes was to provide a system of punishment for voting incorrectly. Therefore, I'm not sure how I feel about the concept of basically opening half-votes up as an intentional option; it breaks the duality of "good votes are 1.0, bad votes are 0.5" and adds an additional level of complexity for voters. I'd like to hear a few other peoples' opinions. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Irrepressible 21:20, 29 May 2011 (EDT)
The intent of re-introducing half-votes was to provide a system of punishment for voting incorrectly. Therefore, I'm not sure how I feel about the concept of basically opening half-votes up as an intentional option; it breaks the duality of "good votes are 1.0, bad votes are 0.5" and adds an additional level of complexity for voters. I'd like to hear a few other peoples' opinions. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Irrepressible 21:20, 29 May 2011 (EDT)
:tbqh, is there a need for a user to make a half-vote intentionally? Even if you like something only slightly better, you should still cast a whole vote for it. Eh. I really don't care. [[User:Dr. Pain 99|<font color="red">'''Doc'''</font>]][[User Talk: Dr. Pain 99|<font color="#ff2400">'''tor'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Dr. Pain 99|<font color="orange">'''Pain'''</font>]][[Special:Editcount/Dr. Pain 99|<font color="yellow">'''99'''</font>]] [[file:DoctorPain99.png|19px]] 21:25, 29 May 2011 (EDT)