Talk:List of NTSC tier lists (disambiguation): Difference between revisions
Zeldasmash (talk | contribs) (→Split) |
(→Split) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:I support splitting it into an article for each game. I don't see any reason why the current set up would be better. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 23:55, 10 February 2011 (EST) | :I support splitting it into an article for each game. I don't see any reason why the current set up would be better. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 23:55, 10 February 2011 (EST) | ||
:I agree as well. Its' too damn long. [[User:Zeldasmash|Zeldasmash]] ([[User talk:Zeldasmash|talk]]) 18:28, 12 February 2011 (EST) | :I agree as well. Its' too damn long. [[User:Zeldasmash|Zeldasmash]] ([[User talk:Zeldasmash|talk]]) 18:28, 12 February 2011 (EST) | ||
==Even the lists?== | |||
I think the lists should be even so it will look better, not that it looks bad now it would be a good way to clean it up. [[User:Doc King|Doc King]] ([[User talk:Doc King|talk]]) 16:50, 24 February 2011 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 16:50, February 24, 2011
And just for posterity, here's the topic that inspired this article. – Masked! ^_^ 04:07, January 19, 2007 (GMT)
Good move, but darnit, I no longer have the monopoly on edits to this article :p – MaskedMarth (t c) 17:44, January 29, 2007 (GMT)
Is there any word on a 2007 tier list? - James Sparrow
- So far, I don't think so, but I'm guessing that there's a lot of speculation as to changes in the list. BurningCrusader777 22:40, August 10, 2007 (EDT)
Once the SBR makes more tier lists for Brawl, it would be wise to move this article to "List of previous SSBM tier lists" and create an article "List of previous SSBB tier lists" as a counterpart. – MaskedMarth (t c) 19:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
1st Brawl list
I think that we should have it the way I had it where it wasn't crooked like that, so it would look more pro and official when ppl see it. Doc King (talk) 12:28, 16 October 2010 (EDT)
Arrangement
Spacing makes it easier to edit later on and when things are not proper nouns, they aren't proper nouns. In addition, adding <center> when the tables are already aligned like that is useless.MegaTron1XD
00:23, 1 January 2011 (EST)
- They're being used as titles of tables, and should probably therefore be title case. Also, since these are past tier lists, I don't see how one would ever need to change them without doing a complete replacement anyway. But yes, using "<center>" for tables is always a waste. Toomai Glittershine
The Wacko 00:26, 1 January 2011 (EST)
Character arrangements
This is the 2nd time i found another error on a tier list. Seriously am i the only one who finds them. Zeldasmash (talk) 08:18, 5 February 2011 (EST)
Split
This is the second-longest page on the wiki and would work well as three seperate articles. I plan to split it soon unless there is significant opposition. Toomai Glittershine The Metroid 22:29, 10 February 2011 (EST)
- I support splitting it into an article for each game. I don't see any reason why the current set up would be better. Omega Tyrant
23:55, 10 February 2011 (EST) - I agree as well. Its' too damn long. Zeldasmash (talk) 18:28, 12 February 2011 (EST)
Even the lists?
I think the lists should be even so it will look better, not that it looks bad now it would be a good way to clean it up. Doc King (talk) 16:50, 24 February 2011 (EST)
