Forum:Average Strength: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
(New Page: {{Forumheader|Watercooler}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> I have started a little project in hopes of finding which cha...) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Watercooler}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | {{Forumheader|Watercooler}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
I have started a little project in hopes of finding which character is really "strongest". I add up all the top damage percentages of each move on a character's moveset, divide by the number of moves on the moveset and get a number. I hope that I will have a chart put out with all the information on it. The system isn't perfected yet (varying strengths of moves, certain damage percentages not on the moveset have been drawbacks), but I have a (REALLY) rough estimate that [[Meta Knight (SSBB|Meta Knight]]'s average strength is 11%, but my calculations have to be fixed. If anyone thinks they might be able to find the average strength, be my guest and post it here. --[[User:Oxico|O2]] ([[User talk:Oxico|talk]]) 19:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | I have started a little project in hopes of finding which character is really "strongest". I add up all the top damage percentages of each move on a character's moveset, divide by the number of moves on the moveset and get a number. I hope that I will have a chart put out with all the information on it. The system isn't perfected yet (varying strengths of moves, certain damage percentages not on the moveset have been drawbacks), but I have a (REALLY) rough estimate that [[Meta Knight (SSBB)|Meta Knight]]'s average strength is 11%, but my calculations have to be fixed. If anyone thinks they might be able to find the average strength, be my guest and post it here. --[[User:Oxico|O2]] ([[User talk:Oxico|talk]]) 19:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC) |