SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Shadowcrest: Difference between revisions
SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Shadowcrest (edit)
Revision as of 01:52, November 25, 2008
, 16 years ago→Neutral
m (→Oppose) |
|||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
::::I was unaware of the general practices at other Wikias, so my concerns are quelled. Perhaps I'll write up guidelines concerning minor edits if any problems actually do arise. That said, I cast my opinion. <font face="centaur">– [[User:MaskedMarth|MaskedMarth]] <sup>([[User talk:MaskedMarth|t]] [[Special:Contributions/MaskedMarth|c]])</sup></font> 00:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | ::::I was unaware of the general practices at other Wikias, so my concerns are quelled. Perhaps I'll write up guidelines concerning minor edits if any problems actually do arise. That said, I cast my opinion. <font face="centaur">– [[User:MaskedMarth|MaskedMarth]] <sup>([[User talk:MaskedMarth|t]] [[Special:Contributions/MaskedMarth|c]])</sup></font> 00:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::General practice outside of Wikia is to only mark edits minor which are actually minor. I personally don't care either way, but at least consider the courtesy of unchecking the box when using talk pages, I'd say, or major content changes. I would be more concerned about edit summary usage; not that I've checked here in this case, but edit summary usage should be both civil and explanatory about the changes you make, and is far better at indicating why you thought a certain edit was major or minor.<br />As for css and js, I'm flattered. I don't think I could even attempt to manipulate .js if I tried, though I'm sure it isn't a hard language to learn. --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] · [[w:c:wow:User:Sky2042|w]]) 04:57, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | :::::General practice outside of Wikia is to only mark edits minor which are actually minor. I personally don't care either way, but at least consider the courtesy of unchecking the box when using talk pages, I'd say, or major content changes. I would be more concerned about edit summary usage; not that I've checked here in this case, but edit summary usage should be both civil and explanatory about the changes you make, and is far better at indicating why you thought a certain edit was major or minor.<br />As for css and js, I'm flattered. I don't think I could even attempt to manipulate .js if I tried, though I'm sure it isn't a hard language to learn. --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] · [[w:c:wow:User:Sky2042|w]]) 04:57, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
*'''Neutral''' I honestly don't know what to think. I know he'd use the tools correctly, plus he's active, but he has a tendency to get on people's nerves. Plus, he's kinda got a low edit count. He's newer than me, but it doesn't mean either of us are underqualified. My vote changes as the edit count goes up, and if he can stick with his goal of becoming a bit more benevolent. '''[[User:Cheezperson|<span style="color:gold">Cheez</span><span style="color:red">person</span>]]''' {[[User talk:Cheezperson|<span style="color:steelblue">talk</span>]]}[[Special:Contributions/Cheezperson|<span style="color:silver">stuff</span>]]''' 05:52, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Do NOT make comments below this comment or the ---- below! It is there to separate RfAs if more than one is on the page at a time! --> | <!-- Do NOT make comments below this comment or the ---- below! It is there to separate RfAs if more than one is on the page at a time! --> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
[[Category:Administration]] | [[Category:Administration]] | ||