SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Shadowcrest: Difference between revisions
m (→Support) |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==== Neutral ==== | ==== Neutral ==== | ||
*''...'' | *Well, while I can see you being a good sysop, I think you don't have enough experience ''here''. I haven't really seen you try to handle user problems, instead just picking a side, or pointing to one of your created policies. I haven't really seen you compromise, and, as I said earlier, I feel you don't have enough experience '''''here'''''. Feel free to counter my pont, or point me to a policy.<span style="font-family: Liorah BT">'''[[User:Smorekingxg456|<span style="color: gold">O,</span>]] [[User Talk:Smorekingxg456|<span style="color: gold">Mighty</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Smorekingxg456|<span style="color: gold">Smoreking</span>]]'''</span> 19:34, 15 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
<!-- Do NOT make comments below this comment or the ---- below! It is there to separate RfAs if more than one is on the page at a time! --> | <!-- Do NOT make comments below this comment or the ---- below! It is there to separate RfAs if more than one is on the page at a time! --> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
[[Category:Administration]] | [[Category:Administration]] | ||
Revision as of 14:34, November 15, 2008
Shadowcrest (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)
Please direct all discussions to the talk page.
Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.
Before I say anything else, I want to say that having a comparatively low editcount doesn't relate to adminship and my comparatively little age here is outweighed by my experience elsewhere. Since this is possibly the only part of this speech you will read/remember, I just thought I'd put that out there.
...but since I know everyone will check anyway, there's links in the title. Or check Special:Contributions/Shadowcrest and/or Special:Editcount/Shadowcrest, if it's easier for you to access from here.
I've held a sysop position elsewhere since March 27, 2008, and I have relatively excelled at the position for some time. So I think it's fair to say I know how wikis work.
Up until recently, I'd have been very confident that I'd be able to field virtually any user conflict that I saw. But my approval rating appears to have dropped, and I know I've come off as an asshole way more than I intended recently. But I'd like everyone to know I'm working on it, and I think I'll be able to pull it off eventually. Opposes based on my personality aren't inherently invalid, but I'd appreciate any good faith.
I'm active enough, and I'd be able to delete spam, ban vandals, and all that other explicitly defined stuff in the job description.
In short: I'm willing and more than capable. --Shadowcrest 18:20, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Support
- Strong support, Shadowcrest know what he's doing and is responsible. Im Alex25, King of Randomness! Say Hi to me! Random stuff! 18:53, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Support. Shadowcrest is knowledgeable, competent, and smart. As, or perhaps more, importantly, he has "Admin-like" edits (see my "vote" on Oxico's RfA) in spades, and I have complete faith in him to "mediate user disputes, arbitrate users, and interpret policy during times of argument" and he has consistently displayed a dedication to this wiki that goes well-above and beyond the call of duty. – Defiant Elements 19:27, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
- ...
Neutral
- Well, while I can see you being a good sysop, I think you don't have enough experience here. I haven't really seen you try to handle user problems, instead just picking a side, or pointing to one of your created policies. I haven't really seen you compromise, and, as I said earlier, I feel you don't have enough experience here. Feel free to counter my pont, or point me to a policy.O, Mighty Smoreking 19:34, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
