SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Cheezperson: Difference between revisions

m
→‎Oppose: sorry :/
m (→‎Oppose: sorry :/)
Line 34: Line 34:
==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
*'''Weak Oppose'''  Cheezperson is without a doubt quite helpful to the wiki.  However, there are three things that make me oppose his sysop bid.  First, I am wary of any person who has significantly more User Talk edits than main space edits.  This often signals that the user is more concerned with using the site as a social utility than as an encyclopedia.  Secondly, there is just the matter of the low edit count overall.  While I am not one who feels that edit quantity is more important than quality, there is something to be said for an overall low edit count.  If I am correct, I had the lowest edit count of any person ever to be promoted to sysop (on this wiki), and at the time I had more mainspace edits than Cheez's total edit count.  Again, not that edit count is of supreme importance, but there has been a certain precedent set.  Finally, the biggest reason that I don't support this user is that I haven't found many instances in his edits where he would need the sysop tools.  Rollback is something that I would fully support for this user, but my checking has shown that this would be the only sysop tool that he would truly need to make what he has been doing more effective.  Again, I do truly value Cheez as an editor, I just do not see the need or the full qualifications to make him a sysop.  [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 17:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Weak Oppose'''  Cheezperson is without a doubt quite helpful to the wiki.  However, there are three things that make me oppose his sysop bid.  First, I am wary of any person who has significantly more User Talk edits than main space edits.  This often signals that the user is more concerned with using the site as a social utility than as an encyclopedia.  Secondly, there is just the matter of the low edit count overall.  While I am not one who feels that edit quantity is more important than quality, there is something to be said for an overall low edit count.  If I am correct, I had the lowest edit count of any person ever to be promoted to sysop (on this wiki), and at the time I had more mainspace edits than Cheez's total edit count.  Again, not that edit count is of supreme importance, but there has been a certain precedent set.  Finally, the biggest reason that I don't support this user is that I haven't found many instances in his edits where he would need the sysop tools.  Rollback is something that I would fully support for this user, but my checking has shown that this would be the only sysop tool that he would truly need to make what he has been doing more effective.  Again, I do truly value Cheez as an editor, I just do not see the need or the full qualifications to make him a sysop.  [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 17:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''. I know this will come out way meaner than I intend it to be, but I feel this really must be said and there's no polite way to say it, so please forgive me. I get the impression that you're only running for 'epeen strength' and that you don't quite understand what will be expected of you as an administrator. Additionally, I am not sure how you would handle user conflicts, but judging from other aspects of your personality I've gathered I am not confident in your abilities. --<font face="vivaldi" size="3">[[User:Shadowcrest|<font color="Steelblue">Shadow</font>]][[User talk:Shadowcrest|<font color="Steelblue">crest</font>]]</font> 15:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


==== Neutral ====
==== Neutral ====
*''...''
*''...''
2,149

edits