SmashWiki talk:Requests for rollback/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

:I disagree with part of SZL's argument.  While it is important to have a decent amount of reverts, being an active vandal combater would suffice in being a rollback'r.  Contributions and activity with vandal combating is also important, and rollback does not always apply to vandalism combating.  What about adding delete tags to spam/joke pages?  You can't find a way to keep track of delete tags on pages that are spam and yet it is also a vital part of vandalism fighting.  Rollback should not be based '''only''' on reverts. '''[[User:Fried beef1|<font color="firebrick">Fried</font><font color="forestgreen">beef</font><font color="goldenrod">1</font>]] [[User talk:Fried beef1|<span style="color:amethyst"><span style="font-size: 60%">Ho ho ho!</span></span>]]''' 01:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

::Vandal Combater=Mostly Reverting Vandalism. And what does delete tags have to do with rollback? Rollback doesn't effect deletion. And anyways, rollback is mass reverting, so reverting is important to rollback, and having little to no reverts probably won't get you rollback. However, the popular "Active, not a vandal" thing applies to half of the community, so should half of the community run?[[Image:SZL.png|45px]][[User:SZL|'''<span style="color:lime">UP</span>]]/[[User talk:SZL|<span style="color:firebrick">T</span>]]''' 01:52, 26 December 2008 (UTC)