SmashWiki talk:Requests for rollback/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
(→‎Reasons please: new section)
Line 51: Line 51:
Just to clear everything up, we're not actually requiring this for sysop.  [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 23:30, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Just to clear everything up, we're not actually requiring this for sysop.  [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 23:30, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
: I don't see what's the big fuss, anyways. Apply if you think it'll help your pattern of edits; don't if it won't. <font face="centaur">&ndash; [[User:MaskedMarth|MaskedMarth]] <sup>([[User talk:MaskedMarth|t]] [[Special:Contributions/MaskedMarth|c]])</sup></font> 16:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
: I don't see what's the big fuss, anyways. Apply if you think it'll help your pattern of edits; don't if it won't. <font face="centaur">&ndash; [[User:MaskedMarth|MaskedMarth]] <sup>([[User talk:MaskedMarth|t]] [[Special:Contributions/MaskedMarth|c]])</sup></font> 16:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
== Reasons please ==
I am tired of seeing reasons that have nothing to with rollback, such as "You've matured since you first came to this wiki". That has nothing to do with rollback. Reasons should be related to Rollback and reverting such as "Your contributions show a good number of reverts, so rollback would help you continue with your reverts." And in my opinion, being active and not being a vandal isn't a good reason. If such was a good reason that could help somebody get promoted, then half of the users here could run. Rollback should be based on reverts, not friendship or activity levels.[[Image:SZL.png|45px]][[User:SZL|'''<span style="color:lime">UP</span>]]/[[User talk:SZL|<span style="color:firebrick">T</span>]]''' 01:37, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Anonymous user