Forum:Possible new policies: Difference between revisions
Supported the new policies
No edit summary |
(Supported the new policies) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Everything looks good so far, IMO. Things seem well-defined and I haven't found any ambiguity that people can abuse. I think there should be added sections about what is and isn't speculation and stuff about valid sources. We tend to come across arguments over issues like that. Other than that, I think it needs a few tweaks and it'll work well for the SmashWiki. '''[[User:Silverdragon706|FyreNWater]]''' - <small>([[User talk:Silverdragon706|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Silverdragon706|Contributions]] )</small> 08:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC) | :Everything looks good so far, IMO. Things seem well-defined and I haven't found any ambiguity that people can abuse. I think there should be added sections about what is and isn't speculation and stuff about valid sources. We tend to come across arguments over issues like that. Other than that, I think it needs a few tweaks and it'll work well for the SmashWiki. '''[[User:Silverdragon706|FyreNWater]]''' - <small>([[User talk:Silverdragon706|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Silverdragon706|Contributions]] )</small> 08:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
This is '''exactly''' what this wiki needs right now. That and some active bureaucrats. I definitely support you and your policies. [[User:Cheezperson|Cheezperson]] ([[User talk:Cheezperson|talk]]) 20:13, 15 August 2008 (UTC) |