32,503
edits
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 343: | Line 343: | ||
:Yes, the experimental night mode that you saw can be enabled [[Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets|here]]. --[[User:Porplemontage|Porplemontage]] ([[User talk:Porplemontage#top|talk]]) 20:49, November 2, 2021 (EDT) | :Yes, the experimental night mode that you saw can be enabled [[Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets|here]]. --[[User:Porplemontage|Porplemontage]] ([[User talk:Porplemontage#top|talk]]) 20:49, November 2, 2021 (EDT) | ||
::It looks great so far! Thanks! <font face="Trebuchet MS">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#0000a5">Blue</span>]] [[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#0000a5">Ninjakoopa</span>]]</font> 23:02, November 2, 2021 (EDT) | ::It looks great so far! Thanks! <font face="Trebuchet MS">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#0000a5">Blue</span>]] [[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#0000a5">Ninjakoopa</span>]]</font> 23:02, November 2, 2021 (EDT) | ||
== Template optimization == | |||
I've been working on one of the trophy templates to expand its functionality and I noticed that one method (with no nested if-statements) has a higher "preprocessor visited node count" but significantly lower "post-expand include size" compared to another method (with nested if-statements). When used 58 times: preproc: 14,648 (current) vs 16,618 (method 1) vs 16,150 (method 2); post-expand: 280,460 (current) vs 306,023 (method 1) vs 382,466 (method 2)). My question is: should I prioritize reducing one value more than the other? Or any of the other values in the profiling data? Between the two, the "CPU time usage" deviates within 0.08 seconds and the resulting HTML difference is less than 100 bytes. --[[User:CanvasK|CanvasK]] ([[User talk:CanvasK|talk]]) 08:13, September 8, 2022 (EDT) | |||
:I would say that reducing CPU time usage is ultimately best, but that value will vary a certain percentage on every parse. In this case the difference seems insignificant, so I would just go with whichever syntax you like better. --[[User:Porplemontage|Porplemontage]] ([[User talk:Porplemontage#top|talk]]) 11:19, September 8, 2022 (EDT) | |||
== Error Alert == | |||
Every time I go to an article, there's always "The "[blank]"® Smash Wiki article from SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki" at the top. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:SuperPiranha85|SuperPiranha85]] ([[User talk:SuperPiranha85|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SuperPiranha85|contribs]]) 13:29, September 1, 2024 (EDT)</small> | |||
:The site tagline is meant to be there. There's something wrong with it? Can you share a screenshot? --[[User:Porplemontage|Porplemontage]] ([[User talk:Porplemontage#top|talk]]) 13:38, September 1, 2024 (EDT) | |||
::I think they may have the Officialiser enabled. In [[Special:Preferences|Preferences]], go to Gadgets and under April Fools' Day make sure "The Officialiser ™ (2024)" is unchecked. --[[User:CanvasK|CanvasK]] ([[User talk:CanvasK|talk]]) 13:39, September 1, 2024 (EDT) |
edits