Talk:Golden Hammer: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(→‎Dropping it: new section)
No edit summary
Tag: Manual revert
 
(43 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


It'll always despawn when it's dropped, right? There's no second chance like there is with the Regular Hammer? I'm pretty sure I've never seen it sitting without its podium. --[[User:Phred|Phred]] ([[User talk:Phred|talk]]) 23:51, 23 August 2011 (EDT)
It'll always despawn when it's dropped, right? There's no second chance like there is with the Regular Hammer? I'm pretty sure I've never seen it sitting without its podium. --[[User:Phred|Phred]] ([[User talk:Phred|talk]]) 23:51, 23 August 2011 (EDT)
:From what I've seen, dropping it would put it in its a standing position until it hits the ground, in which is disappears. If you have a  pic of it sitting without the podium, then present it. <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px|:p]] 00:05, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
::Yes, it despawns when it hits the ground. But it is possible to grab a Golden Hammer dropped by another fighter while it's falling and use it until its timer runs out and it automatically disappears.[[User:Mariofan13|Mariofan13]] ([[User talk:Mariofan13|talk]])
== Origin ==
The ''Mario Party 2'' theory should still be mentioned as a possibility. It's perfectly viable,  as the appearance and striking sounds are very similar, and the way the point of origin was written made it clear that this was unconfirmed. Calling it an original item is just as unconfirmed as the ''Mario Party 2'' theory. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="ff8c00">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="01a3c4">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 11:59, 31 October 2012 (EDT)
:Personal speculation does not belong, and your "theory" is a pretty large stretch (for one, you're linking it to a completely different item). The concept of a squeaky hammer is not unique to Mario Party. And not everything in Smash needs a damn origin.
:I'll also point out headless hammers were implemented in Smash without having an origin in something else (which are the equivalent of the squeaky hammers in a functionally identical item). And in [[SmashWiki is not speculative]], that theory clause applies to the causation of gameplay elements (i.e. glitches), with theories that are both sound and backed up by people knowledgeable on the subject. Do not misinterpret it as being alright to add personal speculation about origins and the like. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 13:26, 31 October 2012 (EDT)
:In addition to what Omega Tyrant says, a good metric to determine the level of speculation in your claim is if it contains the phrase "some believe". I may even propose a policy against weasel words in articles, as they are very counter-encyclopedic. [[User:Mr. Anon|<font color="grey">'''Mr. '''</font><font color="midnightblue">'''Anon'''</font>]][[File:Anon.png|23px|link=Special:Random]][[User talk:Mr. Anon|''<span style="color: black;">talk</span>'']]  19:59, 31 October 2012 (EDT)
== About Wrecking Crew ==
Should we move this to the ''Wrecking Crew'' universe, or just keep it as a ''Mario'' property? [[User:Laniv|Laniv]] ([[User talk:Laniv|talk]]) 13:43, 24 October 2014 (EDT)
:I think we should wait until the game is released. For now, keep it as a Mario property. [[User:Tepig|Tepig]] ([[User talk:Tepig|talk]]) 14:25, 24 October 2014 (EDT)
Anonymous user