Talk:Ryu (SSBU): Difference between revisions

Talk:Ryu (SSBU) (edit)

520 bytes added , 2 years ago

m

44,105

edits

Revision as of 18:29, May 3, 2022 (edit) Meanscreen (talk \| contribs) (→‎Ikan: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:06, May 3, 2022 (edit) (undo) Wiifitkid (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Ikan) Newer edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Do players really need approval when there's already less than 10 on the list? Ikan definitely should be on the historically significant players list after Genesis, there's no real reason not to when there's only 4 other Ryu players listed. [[User:Meanscreen\|Meanscreen]] ([[User talk:Meanscreen\|talk]]) 18:29, May 3, 2022 (EDT)		Do players really need approval when there's already less than 10 on the list? Ikan definitely should be on the historically significant players list after Genesis, there's no real reason not to when there's only 4 other Ryu players listed. [[User:Meanscreen\|Meanscreen]] ([[User talk:Meanscreen\|talk]]) 18:29, May 3, 2022 (EDT)
			:Yeah, the guidelines for inclusion are pretty stringent now, so were necessarily looking for 10 notable players. That said we are in the process of updating the lists again since they've become outdated, and of course always looking for input or dialoge on it. Also, if it helps, here is the [https://www.ssbwiki.com/User:Cookies_and_Creme/Historically_Significant_Player_Watchlist watchlist], though it also needs a little updating. [[User:Wiifitkid\|Wiifitkid]] ([[User talk:Wiifitkid\|talk]]) 19:06, May 3, 2022 (EDT)