Template talk:Significant events: Difference between revisions

::3. Again, we have an entire policy dedicated to this at [[SW:NOTABLE]]. We already have categories like [[:Category:VIP players]]. SmashWiki users have, for the past ten years, used talk pages to discuss about how significant things are, and there's no indication that this template would create the problems that you insist it will. Again, going back to [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Deletionism deletionism], if people argue that there are events missing, articles for those events should be created, instead of deleting what's already there. [[SmashWiki is not complete]]. '''[[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Awesome</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Cardinal 2000</span>]]''' 22:08, December 7, 2020 (EST)

:::Pretty much entirely agree with Ac2k. I can't say I really agree with any of the points Miles made. I don't see any issue with overlap of competitive articles within the mainspace and no policies seem to suggest otherwise. As far as determining what is notable or not, we can easily make an amendment to the Notability policy determining what is and isn't impactful to the scene. I'd definitely argue that these three events in particular have deeply impacted the scene. [[User:SenorMexicano|<span style="color:#850FFA; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px green">'''Señor'''</span> <span style="color:#850FFA;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px green">'''Mexicano'''</span>]] ''[[User talk:SenorMexicano|<span style="color:lightpurple;text-shadow:0px 0px 2px lightgreen">(talk)</span>]]'' 22:16, December 7, 2020 (EST)