1
edit
Template talk:Infobox Smasher/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Template talk:Infobox Smasher/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 14:26, February 12, 2007
, 17 years agoPNG > GIF
No edit summary |
(PNG > GIF) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:: In an infobox there should only be facts related to the subject as a ''smasher''. Age, nationality, and other stuff doesn't quite define that. Also, I think that not all the info should be in a box, some can be in the article. {{User:AltAcnt/sig}} 20:18, February 8, 2007 (GMT) | :: In an infobox there should only be facts related to the subject as a ''smasher''. Age, nationality, and other stuff doesn't quite define that. Also, I think that not all the info should be in a box, some can be in the article. {{User:AltAcnt/sig}} 20:18, February 8, 2007 (GMT) | ||
:::I'm not sure how that became the standard criteria. This ''is'' the Community section of SmashWiki after all. The demographics of the community and geographical locations of the various hubs that keep it alive are both pieces of information that people will want to know (and ''need'' to know if they want to participate as well). As with most stylistic elements of articles, the info can be presented both in the infobox and then, in greater detail, in the body of the article itself without too much community dissent. -- [[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 17:50, February 12, 2007 (GMT) | :::I'm not sure how that became the standard criteria. This ''is'' the Community section of SmashWiki after all. The demographics of the community and geographical locations of the various hubs that keep it alive are both pieces of information that people will want to know (and ''need'' to know if they want to participate as well). As with most stylistic elements of articles, the info can be presented both in the infobox and then, in greater detail, in the body of the article itself without too much community dissent. -- [[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 17:50, February 12, 2007 (GMT) | ||
== PNG > GIF == | |||
I think we should have PNGs rather than GIFs because PNGs hav ethe possibility to carry more colours, and it's a lot easier to convert GIFs/JPGs to PNGs than converting PNGs/JPGs to GIFs for people without the correct software. {{User:AltAcnt/sig}} 18:26, February 12, 2007 (GMT) | |||