User talk:Smiddle/1: Difference between revisions
m (→External Links) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
= Talk under here = | = Talk under here = | ||
{{TOCRIGHT}} | |||
== Thanks == | == Thanks == | ||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
: I meant 3-headlines. I said the wrong thing. Also, headlines produce an editable link to the right, bold text doesn't. {{User:AltAcnt/sig}} 16:25, February 23, 2007 (GMT) | : I meant 3-headlines. I said the wrong thing. Also, headlines produce an editable link to the right, bold text doesn't. {{User:AltAcnt/sig}} 16:25, February 23, 2007 (GMT) | ||
::3's even larger. No article on Smashboards should have enough SWF-specific external links to warrant needing to edit it as a specific section. -- [[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 19:41, February 23, 2007 (GMT) | ::3's even larger. No article on Smashboards should have enough SWF-specific external links to warrant needing to edit it as a specific section. -- [[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 19:41, February 23, 2007 (GMT) | ||
::: As sections, they're clickable links in the TOCs, too. {{User:AltAcnt/sig}} 19:56, February 23, 2007 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 14:56, February 23, 2007
Read this
If I start a discussion on your talk page, I want you to reply on your page. If you start a discussion on my page, I'm gonna reply on my page.
Links
FAQ
All of these questions aren't really "frequently asked", but they have the biggest chance of being asked.
Can you help me with wiki stuff?
Yes.
What are you doing with the categories?
The reason I re-sort pages is because I want to be the pages sorted as a dictionary. Without my changes, a category may look like this:
- A Zeus
- A-Y
- AXsS
- AaQ
- Aacdef
Which is the wrong order. After my changes:
- Aacdef
- AaQ
- AXsS
- A-Y
- A Zeus
I hate people speaking English with bad grammar. May I correct it?
Yep.
Talk under here
Thanks
Thanks for the support. I'm very poor at Swedish, so it's helpful to get tips. Thanks again ^_^ --MaskedMarth 19:39, December 5, 2006 (GMT)
Phenomenon
phenomenon lol, I gots the google toolbar with the spellchecker. Firefox FTW.--Respawn 20:57, January 4, 2007 (GMT)
Category|Name
What's the difference between [[:Category:Smasher]] and [[:Category:Smasher|NintendoKing]]? I've seen it done lots of places but I've wondered what the practical difference is...
- So that the page NintendoKing would be categorized as "Nintendoking". The reason is, that someone named Nintendoisbest woukd come after NintendoKing, which is weird. – Smiddle / talk 16:52, January 11, 2007 (GMT)
Deleting a page
I don't know if you have administrative authority, or if you need it to delete pages, but I created a page which already exist. I created Board The Platforms when there was already a Board the Platforms (the mistake due to a broken link). -ShoeThief
- Nope, I'm not an admin and therefore I can't delete pages. Here is a list of admins. But thank you for the compliment anyway :) – Smiddle ( Talk • Conts ) 10:19, January 21, 2007 (GMT)
Thank you
Thanks for telling me how to put a pic on here, i am fairly new to this sort of thing so you may be hearing from me again, but thanks! user:Atom Samsher 12:26 Febuary 18, 2007
External Links Formatting
You seem to be on a needless mission to change all of these:
External Links
into these:
External Links
Any particular reason why? I'm formatting them in this way because the majority of external links and references do come from SWF and it's much sloppier to have nine links to nine different forum topics that read "TopicName - SWF" along with one that's a myspace. Plus it establishes the forums as the authoritative source for smasher information. Before I continue working on expanding all of these articles, I will need to work out the idiosyncrasies with formatting, so let me know what your thoughts are. I just don't want to waste time coding a bunch of stuff that you will systematically go through and change afterwards; it's a big enough project as is. -- Randall00 14:49, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
- I don't have any particular reason. If you want me to stop, I can do that. But you may see me turning the bold text into 4-headlines, because I don't think bold text as headlines are good. – Smiddle ( Talk • Conts ) 15:14, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
- Well, okay, but I do recommend 5-headlines. 4 is pretty huge text for such a small categorical division. And 5 looks virtually the same as bold text, so I don't really understand what makes it not "good" by comparison to the headline formatting. Don't get me wrong, do whatever you like, it just seems like a bit of a waste of effort that could be spent better elsewhere. -- Randall00 15:50, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
- I meant 3-headlines. I said the wrong thing. Also, headlines produce an editable link to the right, bold text doesn't. – Smiddle ( Talk • Conts ) 16:25, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
