Template:Fact: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Citation Template)
 
(Reformatting to match Wikipedia. (Why aren't these protected, anyway?))
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<includeonly><sup>''([[SmashWiki:Citation|citation needed]])''</sup></includeonly><noinclude>
<includeonly><sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>''[[SmashWiki:Citation|citation needed]]''<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup>[[Category:Articles with unsourced statements]]</includeonly><noinclude>{{documentation}}[[Category:Templates]]</noinclude>
<div align="center">{{fact}}</div>
 
This template should be placed in-line on articles where a particular piece of information's validity is in question.
 
For example, if you run into an article that claims "Ganondorf is heavier than Bowser in SSBM" and you're pretty sure that's not true, insert <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> at the end of the article. This puts the onus on the editor to back up his/her information and provide a reference, per [[SmashWiki:Citation]] to verify that what his/her article says is true.
 
 
 
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:11, March 27, 2019

This template should be placed in-line on articles where a particular piece of information's validity is in question.

For example, if you run into an article that claims "Smasher Y once won a Brawl tournament with Ganondorf over their region's #1 ranked player" and you find the fact dubious as stated, insert {{fact}} at the end of the statement - i.e., "Smasher Y once won a Brawl tournament with Ganondorf over their region's #1 ranked player(citation needed)." This puts the onus on the editor to back up their information and provide a reference, per SmashWiki:Citation, to verify that the information in the article remains factual. Any outright misinformation or particularly egregious claims that aren't backed with a source should just be removed from the article, however, rather than being tagged with this template.

(Transcluded documentation: view)