Talk:List of rumors/Archive 5: Difference between revisions

Line 92: Line 92:
'''SKULL KID''' {{unsigned|104.56.148.18|19:38, February 13, 2019‎ }}
'''SKULL KID''' {{unsigned|104.56.148.18|19:38, February 13, 2019‎ }}
:Imagine being so salty about a wiki's policy that you resort to using a different rumor to attempt to call out a double standard that isn't there. [[User:CardboardLuigi|CardboardLuigi]] ([[User talk:CardboardLuigi|talk]]) 20:04, 13 February 2019 (EST)
:Imagine being so salty about a wiki's policy that you resort to using a different rumor to attempt to call out a double standard that isn't there. [[User:CardboardLuigi|CardboardLuigi]] ([[User talk:CardboardLuigi|talk]]) 20:04, 13 February 2019 (EST)
::Imagine being so salty about someone calling a fansite out on their bullshit that they erase anyone who says anything to the contrary. OR pretend that a leaker was always wrong when he was correct about everything until the base release, and then was wrong from there. But he was always wrong, loz was always right, Kraut Man Bad amirite?  
::Imagine being so salty about someone calling a fansite out on their bullshit that they erase anyone who says anything to the contrary. OR pretend that a leaker was always wrong when he was correct about everything until the base release, and then was wrong from there. But he was always wrong, loz was always right, Kraut Man Bad amirite? {{unsigned|104.56.148.18|00:05, February 21, 2019‎ }}
:::You're missing the point here, IP. Loz made two separate claims: one correct, and one incorrect. And as such, the correct one is considered a leak, while the incorrect one is simply a rumor. Vergeben's leaks, on the other hand, is simply one continuous claim. While there's a number of things he got correct, not everything was proven right or wrong, and that's why it's still on this page. Vergeben will only be added to the "leaks" page if his remaining claims are proven correct. If they are proven wrong, then he'll likely stay on the list of rumors, much like the Gematsu leaks from the last game, which got a number of predictions right but got two predictions wrong. [[User:CardboardLuigi|CardboardLuigi]] ([[User talk:CardboardLuigi|talk]]) 08:28, 21 February 2019 (EST)


Vergeben very openly ''is not a source''. He ''has'' sources. So when he's wrong, ''that means one of his sources was wrong''. He himself is never wrong nor right -- he shares information that sometimes is correct and sometimes isn't. The information on Star Fox Grand Prix and 2D Zelda being wrong says nothing about the Smash leaks because it's almost certainly from a completely different source. Same goes for all of his Smash information, actually; that's why he took so long to say who the Square character was. He had heard different things from different sources. All of his information should be taken with a grain of salt for this reason, but this also means that when he says something wrong, he isn't outright disproven.
Vergeben very openly ''is not a source''. He ''has'' sources. So when he's wrong, ''that means one of his sources was wrong''. He himself is never wrong nor right -- he shares information that sometimes is correct and sometimes isn't. The information on Star Fox Grand Prix and 2D Zelda being wrong says nothing about the Smash leaks because it's almost certainly from a completely different source. Same goes for all of his Smash information, actually; that's why he took so long to say who the Square character was. He had heard different things from different sources. All of his information should be taken with a grain of salt for this reason, but this also means that when he says something wrong, he isn't outright disproven.