2,594
edits
Forum:A new usergroup idea: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:This seems like a good idea. There needs to be some sort of intermediary protection, and 90+100 is long enough for experience. [[User:Bwburke94|Bwburke94]] ([[User talk:Bwburke94|talk]]) 13:03, 11 February 2019 (EST) | :This seems like a good idea. There needs to be some sort of intermediary protection, and 90+100 is long enough for experience. [[User:Bwburke94|Bwburke94]] ([[User talk:Bwburke94|talk]]) 13:03, 11 February 2019 (EST) | ||
:As a new user myself, I think this is fair. However, 100 edits is still a little lenient. Maybe 150 edits minimum should do it. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 13:40, 11 February 2019 (EST) | :As a new user myself, I think this is fair. However, 100 edits is still a little lenient. Maybe 150 edits minimum should do it. I don’t believe that the longer a user is on a wiki, the more tristworhty they are. It’s moreso about the edits. Maybe shorten the time from 90 days to 75 days, and the edit count from 100 to 150. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 13:40, 11 February 2019 (EST) | ||
:I support it, although I don't think 100 edits is enough to prove community trustworthiness. [[User:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman"><span style="color: red;">SugarCookie</span></span>]] [[User talk:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color: green;">420</span></span>]] 04:15, 12 February 2019 (EST) | :I support it, although I don't think 100 edits is enough to prove community trustworthiness. [[User:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman"><span style="color: red;">SugarCookie</span></span>]] [[User talk:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color: green;">420</span></span>]] 04:15, 12 February 2019 (EST) | ||