Talk:Super Smash Bros. Ultimate/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:Super Smash Bros. Ultimate/Archive 1 (view source)

Revision as of 07:49, June 19, 2018

2,429 bytes added , 6 years ago

Whoops, forgot the archive header and also forgot to take the notice with me.

Black Vulpine

Rollbackers

8,134

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{notice|This talk page is to discuss '''the content of the article we have on the upcoming Smash game''', ''not to discuss the game itself''. Read [[SW:TALK|our talk page policy]] before commenting on here, specifically:
+{{archive}}
-* Do not post here about what you think of the game's content.
-* Do not post here what content you wanted to see in the next Smash game.
-* Do not post here about what you think of Smash for the Nintendo Switch in comparison to the other Smash games.
-If you want to discuss Super Smash Bros. for the Nintendo Switch, take it to the [[Forum:Index|forums]]. This talk page is only for discussing the content of our article.}}
 ==Day 1 notes==
@@ Line 26: / Line 21: @@
 :We appreciate the thought, but this is [[SW:TALK|improper use of a talk page]]. [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''the Rurouni'''</span>]] 22:39, 8 March 2018 (EST)
 There is no evident proof that it is completely new. It could be an "enhanced port" which could be considered a "half-sequel". So please calm down. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Yagamilite|Yagamilite]] ([[User talk:Yagamilite|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Yagamilite|contribs]]) 23:57, 13 March 2018</small>
+its true. its a new game.
 == "whether this is a new title or a port of a previous game is unknown" ==
@@ Line 219: / Line 216: @@
 ::We really have no reason to believe it's a deluxe port except development time and several "leaks" that may or may not be real. However, Nintendo consistently calls it a "new" Super Smash Bros., it has a completely new logo, its title is tentative (whereas a deluxe port of SSB4 would almost certainly be called "Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo Switch"), and it has a new design for Link. From an encyclopedic standpoint, we should be reporting on these facts, not speculation and rumors. [[User:TheNuttyOne|TheNuttyOne]] 14:43, 18 May 2018 (EDT)
 That doesn't mean anything. If you really want to report facts, you shouldn't use assumption standpoints as a basis. Even if they stand out strong. We still don't have enough  proof whether or not this is new or not. Believe me, I personally fall on the "new game" side, but point is, no one knows for sure. Also, Nintendo has never, in any way, referred to this as a totally brand new game, much less the "consistently" part. The new logo is just a teaser, they probably wanted to come up with a wittier title than "Smash Bros for the Switch", and Botw Link could very well be a palette swap. [[User:Yagamilite|Yagamilite]] ([[User talk:Yagamilite|talk]]) 23:47, 22 May 2018 (EDT)Yagamilite
+:So if it was a port, would Nintendo put so much hype behind it, only to piss everyone off when they announce it to only be a port? [[Special:Contributions/75.141.57.33|75.141.57.33]] 10:10, 28 May 2018 (EDT)
+::You make a good point, but it doesn't change the fact that there's a strong bubble of uncertainty surrounding the entire thing. Even I am strong in the conviction that it will be a new game, but we just do not know for sure. If we can't write anything without speculating, we can't write anything - it's as simple as that. [[User:Black Vulpine|<span style="color: black;">'''Black Vulpine'''</span>]] of the [[User talk:Black Vulpine|'''Furry Nation''']]. [[Special:Contributions/Black Vulpine|<span style="color: #CC5500">'''Furries make the internets go! :3'''</span>]] 10:38, 28 May 2018 (EDT)
+==Possible Pikachu==
+Look closely and you will see a yellow thing. I can see its Pikachu because-
+*Its short
+*It has ears sticking thus its not Luca's hair
+*Its a yellow shading
+*There are no other characters like this expect Pika Pika
+--[[User:Play Dash|Mega Man is great.]] ([[User talk:Play Dash|talk]]) 06:03, 1 June 2018 (EDT)
+:'''''"With no pun intended, the lineup of characters is an inkblot test; people will see what they want to see. Anything beyond Bowser, Donkey Kong, and Samus is speculation."''''' This is our current stance on the matter, as we consider ourselves a factual wiki and thus opinions are not permitted on main articles. ''[[User:Trainer Alex|<span style="color: blue;">'''Alex'''</span>]] the [[User talk:Trainer Alex|<span style="color: red;">'''Jigglypuff trainer'''</span>]]'' 06:41, 1 June 2018 (EDT)
+No, i mean't in the inkblot picture. --[[Special:Contributions/62.219.147.24|62.219.147.24]] 06:49, 1 June 2018 (EDT)
+== Sudden announcement? ==
+The last three titles (I personally count 3DS/Wii U as the fourth installment rather than fourth and fifth respectively like Sakurai said in an interview) had always been announced in development at least a year or two before their release, rather than months like the Switch version. Why is this? [[Special:Contributions/97.88.58.90|97.88.58.90]] 21:59, 11 June 2018 (EDT)
+:We don't know. [[User:TheNuttyOne|TheNuttyOne]] 22:50, 11 June 2018 (EDT)
+::Possibly due to the rage that the fans did they wanted it. -[[User:Play Dash|Mega Man is great.]] [[User talk:Play Dash|So is Roll.]] 01:06, 12 June 2018 (EDT)
+:::What rage? People wanted the game, yes, but they didn't get upset about it. The entire "WHERE'S SMASH" thing was a meme, and no one was genuinely upset about anything.
+:::And also, Melee was first shown off in August of 2001, ''three'' months before it came out in Japan, and was in development for 13 months. Smash 64 even arguably was announced months before, since Nintendo didn't even know if they wanted to bring the damn thing over here. [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''the College-Bound Rurouni'''</span>]] 01:17, 12 June 2018 (EDT)