User talk:Defiant Elements/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
User talk:Defiant Elements/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 15:30, August 21, 2008
, 16 years ago→With all due respect... - I'm gonna get banned for this, but hey.
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Agreement about...? – [[User:Defiant Elements|<font color="black">Defiant Elements</font>]] 19:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | :::Agreement about...? – [[User:Defiant Elements|<font color="black">Defiant Elements</font>]] 19:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::The the manner in which this fiasco was handled was unfortunate. However, I would like to make something clear. We here at SmashWiki do not need to be rescued. We do not need direct intervention from administrators and bureaucrats from other wikis. We do not need your patronization. Your perspective may have assisted, and that was, I believe what you in particular were trying to do. However, we have good sysops and a good community. This isn't an unprecedented event; if anything, it has been blown way out of proportion and an argument could have been made for you and the other users from foreign wikias 'butting into our business'. It is, in fact, the opinion of the majority of active sysops that the permabans should be removed. We will settle this dispute ourselves. The bottom line is that the site is still up, we still have active contributing users goaled toward the continued excellence of the wiki, and it sites continues to serve the community. In the end, that is the only thing that matters, and there's no argument for the contrary. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 19:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ::::The the manner in which this fiasco was handled was unfortunate. However, I would like to make something clear. We here at SmashWiki do not need to be rescued. We do not need direct intervention from administrators and bureaucrats from other wikis. We do not need your patronization. Your perspective may have assisted, and that was, I believe what you in particular were trying to do. However, we have good sysops and a good community. This isn't an unprecedented event; if anything, it has been blown way out of proportion and an argument could have been made for you and the other users from foreign wikias 'butting into our business'. It is, in fact, the opinion of the majority of active sysops that the permabans should be removed. We will settle this dispute ourselves. The bottom line is that the site is still up, we still have active contributing users goaled toward the continued excellence of the wiki, and it sites continues to serve the community. In the end, that is the only thing that matters, and there's no argument for the contrary. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 19:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::Judging by what I've seen, and No, I have not read all of every contribution on this wiki, the sysops on this wiki are bad at being such. They don't seem to understand that, if a majority of users thinks that its unfair, than they're not doing their job right. Sysops are thinking "Mkay, that guy insulted me, so I'mma ban him for 2 weeks". Insulting somone consistantly for 2 weeks and taking every snide oppertunity present I could understand their ban for 2 weeks.. for a couple of mild insults, or perhaps just a decleration that they don't like the way that its run, you wouldn't get a one hour ban- never mind a 2 week one. The vandals are getting the same ban-time as people who are insulting others, which is just dumb. "However, we have good sysops and a good community." - and I quote; "lolurite". In short? Your sysops suck. Replace them. I'm gonna get a ban for stating this, but hey, I don't think I was planning on doing much anyway. Just came for the epicness, and stayed to try to point out the flaws. I quite like your "we dont need your help GTFO". Pretty funny.. :] --<div class="plainlinks">[http://www.guildwars.wikia.com/wiki/User:Warwick Warwick]</div> 19:30, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | |||