Page history

185.8.196.10

→‎Most historically significant players

Diddy Kongstar

→‎Moveset

Beep

→‎Changes from Super Smash Bros. 4

Cookies and Creme

I don't really see much purpose in adding context wins like this; also it shouldn't be a list of wins; these sections should have actual descriptions as to why they are notable

Hydreigonfan01

→‎Tier placement and history

Hydreigonfan01

→‎Most historically significant players: Added wins.

Cookies and Creme

→‎Most historically significant players: expanded on each player's description so it's less of a regurgitation of results

CSR

→‎Most historically significant players: ShinyMark's performance is significantly better than ESAM's and he is placing higher placements than he is right now.

EXemplary Logic

making edit notice more proper

Cookies and Creme

→‎Most historically significant players: removing Enki, DM per Discord. Adding H4

Cookies and Creme

rewording and condensing the introduction

Cookies and Creme

Reverted edits by 24.255.227.140 (talk) to last version by Omega Tyrant.

24.255.227.140

no edit summary

Omega Tyrant

Some touch ups

Cookies and Creme

→‎Tier placement and history: not sure the best way to do this

Cookies and Creme

→‎Tier placement and history

PorpleBot

Text replacement - "(\[\[:?[Cc]ategory: ?[^\|\]\n]+) professionals" to "$1 players"

Omega Tyrant

Wii Fit Trainers' category has 95 players, using the amount of players in the wiki categories to declare a playerbase's size is a shitty metric when many noteworthy players don't have articles yet, certain characters will have active editors biased towards them, players in the categories don't play the character any more, players are often put into categories they don't belong, etc.

RickTommy

60+ categorised professionals is not even close to "small"

Cookies and Creme

→‎Most historically significant players

PokemonMasterJamal3

Undid edit by SuperOreoCookie: While I wouldn't say ShinyMark is "slightly inferior to ESAM" (his recent results are probably better than ESAM's, honestly), I don't think it's super definitive right now either way.

SuperOreoCookie

→‎Most historically significant players

CSR

→‎Most historically significant players: Having beaten Leo and gone on Top 8, ShinyMark's skill is almost on par with ESAM's. (just slightly inferior than him)

Diddy Kongstar

→‎In competitive play

DrPacPHD

Rearranged some sentences so the blurb could flow better.

DrPacPHD

Revised and added info to the top paragraph

Omega Tyrant

Anything like this should be removed elsewhere then, it's shitty trivia that is of no real relevance and is immediately obvious to anyone just looking at the tier list page.

Ultimate Toad

Of course TPC obligates us to use it

Ultimate Toad

Pika's turn for a blurb or something

Diddy Kongstar

Undid edit by Aidanzapunk: Other pages have this

Aidanzapunk

Undid edit by Diddy Kongstar: unnecessary

Diddy Kongstar

no edit summary

Diddy Kongstar

no edit summary

CanvasK

no edit summary

Meester Tweester

no edit summary

Meester Tweester

no edit summary

Diddy Kongstar

no edit summary

CanvasK

no edit summary

101.112.57.156

→‎{{SSBU|Classic Mode}}: I Choose You!

Prolyfic8

no edit summary

Cookies and Creme

→‎Most historically significant players: removing Day, Lalo, Tachyon as per discussion. Leaving DM and Enki as further discussion is required. This section really should not have 10 players

ThomasGray

→‎In competitive play: I don't think questions should be presented in the actual pages.

CanvasK

no edit summary

Cookies and Creme

→‎In competitive play

Cookies and Creme

→‎In competitive play: integrated the new addition into the negatives paragraph

PK Gaming

Modernized the competitive play section/fixed some grammatical mistakes

Cookies and Creme

→‎Most historically significant players

Cookies and Creme

→‎In competitive play

CanvasK

Undid edit by 152.172.17.14: 

152.172.17.14

→‎Victory poses