Editing Forum:Post-launch DLC and Most Recent Appearance

Warning You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 5: Line 5:


Given this scenario and  the potential of such cases repeating in the future for other characters, do we now consider post-launch DLC for a game to be a separate product qualifiable for a most recent appearance or do we disregard them entirely and consider only the base game's release date even if so-and-so-character was not included in the on-disc package, coming in only through a later online update? [[User:Pikawil|Pikawil]] ([[User talk:Pikawil|talk]]) 19:43, 28 March 2014 (EDT)
Given this scenario and  the potential of such cases repeating in the future for other characters, do we now consider post-launch DLC for a game to be a separate product qualifiable for a most recent appearance or do we disregard them entirely and consider only the base game's release date even if so-and-so-character was not included in the on-disc package, coming in only through a later online update? [[User:Pikawil|Pikawil]] ([[User talk:Pikawil|talk]]) 19:43, 28 March 2014 (EDT)
:Well, seeing as Sony and Microsoft basically do the same thing, it's no surprise that Nintendo would do this. I mean, look at a few examples:
:Resident Evil 6 for PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 had an update that included the character, Agent.
:Super Street Fighter IV, Call of Duty: Ghosts and Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 all have DLC of something after their releases, that were not on the disk.
:Case in-point, it's no surprise DLC like this would happen. At least its an Update and not a micro-transaction. [[User:Requiem of Ice|Requiem of Ice]] ([[User talk:Requiem of Ice|talk]]) 07:23, 29 March 2014 (EDT)
::You completely missed the point of the post.
::In my opinion, whether DLC should count for the box should be based on how major the character's role is. I would consider the criteria something like "Would the game be the same if the character wasn't there?"; if the answer is yes, then it's probably not notable enough an appearance to mention. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Undirigible 11:39, 29 March 2014 (EDT)
:::Due to the fact that DLC isn't its own separate game, I don't think it should take the place of a newer game featuring that character. The way I see it, the "Most Recent Appearance" section is only for games and applications that can be bought or downloaded, not DLC. Unless the DLC actually is the newest game the character is from (i.e. If Sheik made a DLC appearance in the new Mario Kart), I think it should state whichever game was released later. <span style="font-family:AR JULIAN; font-size:12pt">[[User:ChuckNorris24|<span style="color:green">Chuck</span>]][[User talk:ChuckNorris24|<span style="color:green">Norris</span>]]</span>[[File:24.png|23px]] 15:31, 29 March 2014 (EDT)

Please note that all contributions to SmashWiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see SmashWiki:Copyrights for details). Your changes will be visible immediately. Please enter a summary of your changes above.

Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page: