Link (SSB): Difference between revisions

Link (SSB) (edit)

Revision as of 01:38, May 24, 2023

166 bytes removed , 1 year ago

m

→‎In competitive play: We don't denote a ranking anymore like that, these are historical lists, not active best players lists, and anything about rankings should be integrated into the blurbs. Also putting the cleanup tag back on, as these blurbs are extremely basic. Finally, I removed the players who have nothing written at all about their Link, they can be possibly added back if a proper blurb is written for them.

Omega Tyrant

Administrators

16,289

edits

@@ Line 200: / Line 200: @@
 ==In [[competitive play]]==
-===Tier placement and history===
+===Most historically significant players===
-Throughout the history of Smash 64, Link has always been regarded as one of the worst characters in the game. On the first tier list for 64, he was dead last in bottom tier, sharing it with Samus. He rose up to 11th on the second tier list then he would remain, but share the same placement of 10th-11th with Luigi on the third list. He would regain the placement of 11th tier on the fourth and most current tier list where he remains the second worst character in the game.
+{{cleanup|These blurbs are overly basic and need to be rewritten to better explain how these are players are historically significant to Link's metagame.}}
-However, in spite of his placement, Link has achieved high results in a few tournaments due to the performance of players such as Isai, Gyaki and Sekirei. Even with these impressive placements, it is unknown if Link will ever get out of the bottom two spots that he has consistently remained in throughout the game's lifespan.
-===Most historically significant players===
 :''See also: [[:Category:Link players (SSB)]]''
+<!--This character has a 10 player limit for this section. Before adding and/or removing a player, read these guidelines: https://www.ssbwiki.com/SmashWiki:Notability#%22Most_historically_significant_players%22_guidelines -->
-<!--This character has a 10 player limit for this section. Before adding and/or removing a player, read these guidelines: https://www.ssbwiki.com/SmashWiki:Notability#%22Most_historically_significant_players%22_guidelines
-A lot of them could be removed -->
-''Numbers in brackets indicate position in [[2019-2020 Smash 64 Power Rankings]]''
-*{{Sm|A$|USA}} - 3rd at [[Zenith 2013]]. Switched to other characters
-*{{Sm|DSC|Australia}} - Ranked 5th in Australia in 2017.
-*{{Sm|Firo|USA}} - More known for his Ness.
 *{{Sm|Gyaki|Japan}} - 2nd best Link in Japan, placed 5th at [[Snosa III]] and 2nd at [[Kansai 2017]].
 *{{Sm|Hebiichigo|Japan}} - Japan's 3rd best Link.
-*{{Sm|Isai|USA}} (#12) - Placed 2nd at [[Apex 2012]] and won [[MELEE-FC Diamond|FC Diamond]] (2007) and [[B.E.A.S.T 7]] (2017) with Link.
+*{{Sm|Isai|USA}} - Placed 2nd at [[Apex 2012]] with solo Link, while also winning [[MELEE-FC Diamond]] (2007) and [[B.E.A.S.T 7]] while using Link alongside other characters.
-*{{Sm|Kort|Brazil}} - More known for his Pikachu.
 *{{Sm|Sekirei|Japan}} - Best Link in the world.
-*{{Sm|Wincancel|Canada}}
+===Tier placement and history===
+Throughout the history of Smash 64, Link has always been regarded as one of the worst characters in the game. On the first tier list for 64, he was dead last in bottom tier, sharing it with Samus. He rose up to 11th on the second tier list then he would remain, but share the same placement of 10th-11th with Luigi on the third list. He would regain the placement of 11th tier on the fourth and most current tier list where he remains the second worst character in the game.
+However, in spite of his placement, Link has achieved high results in a few tournaments due to the performance of players such as Isai, Gyaki and Sekirei. Even with these impressive placements, it is unknown if Link will ever get out of the bottom two spots that he has consistently remained in throughout the game's lifespan.
 ==In Single-player==